Thanks Grant
> -Original Message-
> From: Grant Likely [mailto:grant.lik...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 1:44 AM
> To: boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-disc...@arm.com
> Cc: Udit Kumar ; Grant Likely
> Subject: [PATCH] v0.6-pre1 draft comments responses
>
>
On 11.07.18 22:15, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 11/07/2018 21:13, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Grant,
>>
>> On 9 July 2018 at 06:17, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> Editing in response to comments from Bill Mills, Daniel Thompson, and
>>> Alex Graf. Mostly trivial editorial, but did flush out the discussion of
Edits responding to comments from Udit Kumar
Suggested-by: Udit Kumar
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely
---
source/chapter1-about.rst | 16 +---
source/chapter4-firmware-media.rst | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/source/chapter1-about.rst
Hi Grant,
On 9 July 2018 at 06:17, Grant Likely wrote:
> Editing in response to comments from Bill Mills, Daniel Thompson, and
> Alex Graf. Mostly trivial editorial, but did flush out the discussion of
> how future updates to the specification would be handled, and added a
> note about DT
On 11/07/2018 06:33, Udit Kumar wrote:
Hi Grant
Few comments
1/ 1.1 Introduction
For example, an Arm A-class embedded networking platform
to
For example, an Arm A-class embedded platform
done
2/ 1.2 Guiding Principals
EBBR as a specification defines requirements
to
EBBR as a
On 09/07/2018 19:47, Dong Wei wrote:
Grant,
We don't need to change anything in the UEFI Spec. All we need to do is to
request the addition of /Firmware directory in the registry. You can send the
request to the USWG chair. There is a link on that page to send the request.
Okay, I'll do
On 9 July 2018 at 17:41, Rob Herring wrote:
> All PM domain drivers must be built-in (at least those using DT), so
> there is no point deferring probe after initcalls are done. Continuing
> to defer probe may prevent booting successfully even if managing PM
> domains is not required. This can
