On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:09:45PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 5/6/20 3:18 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 05/05/2020 17:41, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >> On 05.05.20 17:44, Grant Likely wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I'm considering doing a quick point-release for EBBR to add
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 20:00, Grant Likely wrote:
>
>
>
> On 06/05/2020 17:57, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 18:41, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>
> >> On 06.05.20 17:14, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>> On 5/6/20 5:01 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > ...
> Right, so the kernel stub
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:09:45PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 5/6/20 3:18 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>
[...]
> For the other variable services the patch series provides a compliant
> solution.
>
> Ilias Apalodimas has a draft patch series for using OP-TEE and MM for
> managing variables.
On 5/6/20 3:18 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>
>
> On 05/05/2020 17:41, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> On 05.05.20 17:44, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm considering doing a quick point-release for EBBR to address the
>>> change to RuntimeServicesSupported in UEFI 2.8 Errata A. From 2.8final
>
Le mer. 6 mai 2020 à 20:00, Grant Likely a écrit :
>
>
> On 06/05/2020 17:57, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 18:41, Heinrich Schuchardt
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 06.05.20 17:14, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>> On 5/6/20 5:01 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > ...
> Right, so the kernel st
On 06/05/2020 17:57, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 18:41, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 06.05.20 17:14, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 5/6/20 5:01 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
...
Right, so the kernel stub is completely out and language is needed for
when the DTB becomes 'sedimented'.
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 18:41, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 06.05.20 17:14, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 5/6/20 5:01 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
...
> >> Right, so the kernel stub is completely out and language is needed for
> >> when the DTB becomes 'sedimented'.
> >> - Before ExitBootServices()
>
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 18:40, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 06.05.20 17:14, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 5/6/20 5:01 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On 06/05/2020 15:56, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>> On 5/6/20 4:54 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>
>
> On 06/05/2020 15:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote
On 06.05.20 17:14, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 5/6/20 5:01 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On 06/05/2020 15:56, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 5/6/20 4:54 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On 06/05/2020 15:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 5/6/20 4:38 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>> Only if the door i
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 17:01, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> On 06/05/2020 15:56, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 5/6/20 4:54 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 06/05/2020 15:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>> On 5/6/20 4:38 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Only if the door is wide open. If there is a /rea
On 5/6/20 5:01 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On 06/05/2020 15:56, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 5/6/20 4:54 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On 06/05/2020 15:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 5/6/20 4:38 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Only if the door is wide open. If there is a /real need/ for a
limited set of changes to
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 15:56, Grant Likely wrote:
>
>
> On 05/05/2020 16:57, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 17:49, Heinrich Schuchardt
> wrote:
> >>
> > ...
> >>
> >> As long as device-trees loaded by an EFI application like GRUB do not
> >> fully describe boards and miss on copy
On 06/05/2020 15:56, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 5/6/20 4:54 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On 06/05/2020 15:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 5/6/20 4:38 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Only if the door is wide open. If there is a /real need/ for a
limited set of changes to the dtb, then those specific cases can
On 5/6/20 4:54 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On 06/05/2020 15:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 5/6/20 4:38 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Only if the door is wide open. If there is a /real need/ for a
limited set of changes to the dtb, then those specific cases can be
spelled out as things firmware is allowe
On 06/05/2020 15:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 5/6/20 4:38 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Only if the door is wide open. If there is a /real need/ for a limited
set of changes to the dtb, then those specific cases can be spelled
out as things firmware is allowed to modify in a replacement DTB. Any
s
On 5/6/20 4:38 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On 06/05/2020 15:21, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 15:56, Grant Likely wrote:
On 05/05/2020 16:57, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 17:49, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
...
As long as device-trees loaded by an EFI applica
On 06/05/2020 15:21, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 15:56, Grant Likely wrote:
On 05/05/2020 16:57, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 17:49, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
...
As long as device-trees loaded by an EFI application like GRUB do not
fully describe boa
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 15:56, Grant Likely wrote:
>
>
>
> On 05/05/2020 16:57, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 17:49, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>
> > ...
> >>
> >> As long as device-trees loaded by an EFI application like GRUB do not
> >> fully describe boards and miss on copyi
Describe details of how to pass a DTB from firmware to the OS. Specifies
the GUID for passing the DTB via the EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE and the memory
type needs to be EfiACPIReclaimMemory.
Fixes: #45
Cc: Andrei Warkentin
Cc: Francois Ozog
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely
---
source/chap
UEFI 2.8 Errata A changed RuntimeServiceSupported value to be passed via
an EFI_RT_PROPERTIES_TABLE instead of via a runtime variable.
This is a breaking change and we should do a new EBBR release in short
order to keep EBBR up to date with what is in UEFI. However, real world
impact is minimal. U
On 05/05/2020 16:57, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 17:49, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
...
As long as device-trees loaded by an EFI application like GRUB do not
fully describe boards and miss on copying memory reservations,
boot-hartid and everything else needed for successful
On 05/05/2020 17:41, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 05.05.20 17:44, Grant Likely wrote:
Hi all,
I'm considering doing a quick point-release for EBBR to address the
change to RuntimeServicesSupported in UEFI 2.8 Errata A. From 2.8final
to 2.8_A, RuntimeServicesSupported changed from being a var
22 matches
Mail list logo
