Re: [DTE] May 27th call agenda

2020-05-13 Thread Joakim Bech
On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 20:48, CVS wrote: > > Android DT overlay presentation next call > If folks are interested and time permits, > i would like to demo - Device Tree Visualiser. > > It is a tool i have written to manage complex hierarchies of device trees. > (like the ones in Android / OEM vend

Re: [DTE] May 27th call agenda

2020-05-13 Thread CVS
> Android DT overlay presentation next call If folks are interested and time permits, i would like to demo - Device Tree Visualiser. It is a tool i have written to manage complex hierarchies of device trees. (like the ones in Android / OEM vendor trees) A brief intro and a static screenshot is av

Re: [RFC] SMC yielding Trusted OS call discrepancies

2020-05-13 Thread Achin Gupta
+Jose (SMCCC maintainer) From: boot-architecture on behalf of François Ozog Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020, 6:51 PM To: Boot Architecture Mailman List Subject: [RFC] SMC yielding Trusted OS call discrepancies Hi, Trusted OSes such as OP-TEE or QSEE are using SM

[RFC] SMC yielding Trusted OS call discrepancies

2020-05-13 Thread François Ozog
Hi, Trusted OSes such as OP-TEE or QSEE are using SMC yielding function numbers in the 0x3200-0x326F range. The SMC calling conventions are specified in DEN0028 which has currently three versions (see below). To the best of my understanding, the use of this range is: - compliant with vers

[DTE] May 27th call agenda

2020-05-13 Thread François Ozog
Hi, yet another email to spam you more I propose to have an Android DT overlay presentation next call and add topics that may arise from the list. Should you think we should discuss a particular topic, please respond to this mail thread. Cordially, Francois-Frederic

[DTE] DT update policies

2020-05-13 Thread François Ozog
Hi, Following the presentation byt Joakim: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1CvKBBZ33ggzyhP2ub8iZ410I_KGrFjHftZLmTY0-23A/edit?usp=sharing The following does **NOT** represent consensus. I'd like to use those statements to trigger discussion: - a DTB (say osDTB) is passed from firmware to "

[DTE] May 1"th meeting notes and other meetings

2020-05-13 Thread François Ozog
Hi, please find the meeting notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bz3BfVlXvvHO-kKC0Y1N2SGqPjlxe5eu3dM8sKURC84/edit?usp=sharing As a reminder: there will be two calls per month: - 2nd wednesday 2pm UTC - 4th wednesday 2pm UTC 2pm UTC currently corresponds to 7am PST / 4pm CET. Call to be

Re: [EBBR PATCH] Add EFI GUID for device tree blob

2020-05-13 Thread Grant Likely
On 13/05/2020 13:54, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On 5/13/20 2:48 PM, Grant Likely wrote: On 12/05/2020 18:54, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: [...] """ If a DTB is used to describe the platform to the OS, it must be installed as a EFI configuration table under the appropriate GUID by the system firmware b

Re: [EBBR PATCH] Add EFI GUID for device tree blob

2020-05-13 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 5/13/20 2:48 PM, Grant Likely wrote: On 12/05/2020 18:54, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On 5/12/20 7:23 PM, Grant Likely wrote: On 12/05/2020 18:16, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 19:05, Grant Likely wrote: On 07/05/2020 20:15, Daniel Thompson wrote: On Thu, May 07, 2020 at

Re: [EBBR PATCH] Add EFI GUID for device tree blob

2020-05-13 Thread Grant Likely
On 12/05/2020 18:54, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On 5/12/20 7:23 PM, Grant Likely wrote: On 12/05/2020 18:16, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 19:05, Grant Likely wrote: On 07/05/2020 20:15, Daniel Thompson wrote: On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 05:32:40PM +0200, François Ozog wrote: On

Re: [EBBR PATCH] Add EFI GUID for device tree blob

2020-05-13 Thread Grant Likely
On 06/05/2020 15:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On 5/6/20 4:38 PM, Grant Likely wrote: On 06/05/2020 15:21, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 15:56, Grant Likely wrote: On 05/05/2020 16:57, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 17:49, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: ... As