Hi Tom
Le lun. 25 oct. 2021 à 18:59, Tom Rini a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 05:41:44PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 03:59:49PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > On 10/25/21 15:32, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 01:51:34PM +0200, H
>> SystemReady should require that the firmware complies to the license
requirements of its components.
SystemReady tests compliances to the hardware and firmware minimum interfaces,
we are not dealing with code bases and there license requirements.
From: boot-architecture on behalf
of Heinric
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 03:59:49PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 10/25/21 15:32, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 01:51:34PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > On 10/25/21 12:43, François Ozog wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > back in April we had a workshop on firm
On 10/25/21 15:32, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 01:51:34PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 10/25/21 12:43, François Ozog wrote:
Hi
back in April we had a workshop on firmware sustainability. Since then a
number of discussions related concerns on closed source components
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 01:51:34PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 10/25/21 12:43, François Ozog wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > back in April we had a workshop on firmware sustainability. Since then a
> > number of discussions related concerns on closed source components in TF-A
> > and U-Boot commu
On 10/25/21 12:43, François Ozog wrote:
Hi
back in April we had a workshop on firmware sustainability. Since then a
number of discussions related concerns on closed source components in TF-A
and U-Boot communities. We are also approaching a technical maturity level
U-Boot is licenced under GPL
Hi Dong,
On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 at 13:45, Dong Wei wrote:
> In 4.4 of BBR when discussing LBBR recipe we do provide a note to point to
> the OSF checklist. However, SystemReady is not the place to require it. Arm
> supports both open and commercial firmware.
>
Indeed. Should we express not a requi
In 4.4 of BBR when discussing LBBR recipe we do provide a note to point to the
OSF checklist. However, SystemReady is not the place to require it. Arm
supports both open and commercial firmware.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 25, 2021, at 6:44 AM, François Ozog wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> back in April w
Hi
back in April we had a workshop on firmware sustainability. Since then a
number of discussions related concerns on closed source components in TF-A
and U-Boot communities. We are also approaching a technical maturity level
on SystemReady that it looks timely to revisit this aspect.
Would it be
