On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 15:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
>
> On 05/12/2023 10:45, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > + U-boot custodians list
> >
> > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 12:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 05/12/2023 08:13, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > @DT bindings maintainers,
> >
> > Gi
Le 5 déc. 2023 à 13:48, Daniel Thompson a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:36:28AM +, ff wrote:
Le 5 déc. 2023 à 10:46, Sumit Garg a écrit :
+ U-boot custodians list
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 12:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
On 05/12/2023 08:13, Sumit Garg wrote:
@DT bindings maintaine
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:36:28AM +, ff wrote:
> > Le 5 déc. 2023 à 10:46, Sumit Garg a écrit :
> >
> > + U-boot custodians list
> >
> >> On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 12:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 05/12/2023 08:13, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > @DT bindings maintainers,
> >
>
> Le 5 déc. 2023 à 10:46, Sumit Garg a écrit :
>
> + U-boot custodians list
>
>> On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 12:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/12/2023 08:13, Sumit Garg wrote:
> @DT bindings maintainers,
>
> Given the ease of maintenance of DT bindings within Linux ker
+ U-boot custodians list
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 12:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
>
> On 05/12/2023 08:13, Sumit Garg wrote:
> >>> @DT bindings maintainers,
> >>>
> >>> Given the ease of maintenance of DT bindings within Linux kernel
> >>> source tree, I don't have a specific objection there. But
