On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 1:14 AM Grant Likely wrote:
>
> On 23/06/2021 07:34, Atish Patra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 7:54 AM Grant Likely wrote:
> > Regarding "UEFI Boot at S mode" section [1], it just tries to
> > emphasize that UEFI boot at S-mode is the most common scenario for
> > curre
On 23/06/2021 07:34, Atish Patra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 7:54 AM Grant Likely wrote:
Regarding "UEFI Boot at S mode" section [1], it just tries to
emphasize that UEFI boot at S-mode is the most common scenario for
current/near future platforms as
there are not many platforms with hypervis
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 7:54 AM Grant Likely wrote:
>
> On 22/06/2021 15:05, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 22/06/2021 15:18, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On 22/06/2021 11:50, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 12:35:17PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
>
> On
On 22/06/2021 15:18, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 22/06/2021 11:50, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 12:35:17PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/06/2021 22:55, Grant Likely wrote:
On 21/06/2021 21:53, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
> I've pushe
On 22/06/2021 15:05, Matthias Brugger wrote:
On 22/06/2021 15:18, Grant Likely wrote:
On 22/06/2021 11:50, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 12:35:17PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
On 21/06/2021 22:55, Grant Likely wrote:
On 21/06/2021 21:53, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
I
On 21/06/2021 22:55, Grant Likely wrote:
>
>
> On 21/06/2021 21:53, Grant Likely wrote:
> [...]
>
>> I've pushed my edited copy out to a temporary branch. You can see it here:
>>
>> https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/commit/9d4632a3911fd460cb1adf6a5b1a2b13650b5ab4
>
>
> Correction, here:
On 22/06/2021 11:50, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 12:35:17PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
On 21/06/2021 22:55, Grant Likely wrote:
On 21/06/2021 21:53, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
I've pushed my edited copy out to a temporary branch. You can see it here:
https://github.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 12:35:17PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
>
> On 21/06/2021 22:55, Grant Likely wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 21/06/2021 21:53, Grant Likely wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >> I've pushed my edited copy out to a temporary branch. You can see it here:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/ARM-s
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 1:53 PM Grant Likely wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 21/06/2021 18:35, Atish Patra wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 10:19 AM Grant Likely
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 10/05/2021 18:37, Atish Patra
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 1:53 PM Grant Likely wrote:
>
>
>
> On 21/06/2021 18:35, Atish Patra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 10:19 AM Grant Likely wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/05/2021 18:37, Atish Patra wrote:
> [...]
> >>> +
> >>> +UEFI Boot at S mode
> >>> +^^
> >>> +
On 21/06/2021 21:53, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
I've pushed my edited copy out to a temporary branch. You can see it here:
https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/commit/9d4632a3911fd460cb1adf6a5b1a2b13650b5ab4
Correction, here:
https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/commit/714f6fd6747f61c0557
On 21/06/2021 18:35, Atish Patra wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 10:19 AM Grant Likely wrote:
On 10/05/2021 18:37, Atish Patra wrote:
[...]
+
+UEFI Boot at S mode
+^^
+
+Most systems are expected to boot UEFI at S mode as the hypervisor extension
[RVHYPSPEC]_ is
+sti
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 10:19 AM Grant Likely wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/05/2021 18:37, Atish Patra wrote:
> > This patch adds all the required content to make RISC-V EBBR compatible.
> > The additional content is not a lot given that we just need to update the
> > architecture specific sections for RIS
On 10/05/2021 18:37, Atish Patra wrote:
This patch adds all the required content to make RISC-V EBBR compatible.
The additional content is not a lot given that we just need to update the
architecture specific sections for RISC-V. Rest of the document is ISA agnostic
anyways.
Signed-off-by: Ati
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:37 AM Atish Patra wrote:
>
> This patch adds all the required content to make RISC-V EBBR compatible.
> The additional content is not a lot given that we just need to update the
> architecture specific sections for RISC-V. Rest of the document is ISA
> agnostic
> anyway
This patch adds all the required content to make RISC-V EBBR compatible.
The additional content is not a lot given that we just need to update the
architecture specific sections for RISC-V. Rest of the document is ISA agnostic
anyways.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra
---
source/chapter1-about.rst
16 matches
Mail list logo