Agree, that's what we will do.
- DW
-
-Original Message-
From: arm.ebbr-discuss-boun...@arm.com On
Behalf Of Graeme Gregory
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 8:37 AM
To: udit.ku...@nxp.com
Cc: nd ; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; Mark Brown
; arm.ebbr-discuss
Subject: Re:
On 12/07/2018 16:56, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 16:50, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 9:37 AM Graeme Gregory
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 16:30, Udit Kumar wrote:
Hi Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Brown [mailto:broo...@kernel.org]
Sent:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 16:50, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 9:37 AM Graeme Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 16:30, Udit Kumar wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Mark
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Mark Brown [mailto:broo...@kernel.org]
> > > > Sent:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 9:37 AM Graeme Gregory
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 16:30, Udit Kumar wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mark
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Mark Brown [mailto:broo...@kernel.org]
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 8:20 PM
> > > To: Udit Kumar
> > > Cc: Ard
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 16:30, Udit Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi Mark
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Brown [mailto:broo...@kernel.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 8:20 PM
> > To: Udit Kumar
> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel ; Architecture Mailman List
> > ; nd ; arm.ebbr-discuss
> >
> >
Hi Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Brown [mailto:broo...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 8:20 PM
> To: Udit Kumar
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel ; Architecture Mailman List
> ; nd ; arm.ebbr-discuss
>
> Subject: Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] [RFC] uefi: Account for SetVariable() not
On 12/07/2018 15:46, Dong Wei wrote:
Grant,
I think the variables are defined by the specs as either non-volatile or
volatile. It should not be changing.
Alright, I'm looking for alternate proposals then.
How should EBBR support platforms which cannot write non-volatile
variables from
On 12/07/2018 14:12, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 01:50:45PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:41:08AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
Add details on what to do if the platform is unable to set persistent
variables in runtime services. The idea here is that the
Grant,
I think the variables are defined by the specs as either non-volatile or
volatile. It should not be changing.
- DW
-
-Original Message-
From: Grant Likely
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 3:41 AM
To: boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss
Cc: nd ; Grant Likely ; Dong
Hi Ard
> > Do any existing implementations change variables from non-volatile to
> > volatile?
> >
>
> The UEFI spec is explicit about which variables are volatile and which are
> not.
> Simply relaxing non-volatile to volatile in the general case doesn't seem
> like a
> useful approach to me.
On 12 July 2018 at 15:12, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 01:50:45PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>
>> The OS will discover the variable is non-modifiable when it tried to
>> set it. Won't the current proposal mislead standards compliant use of
>> GetVariable()? For example does it
11 matches
Mail list logo
