RE: UEFI on BeagleBoard qEmu

2011-07-11 Thread Olivier Martin
Thanks Loic for your feedbacks, it is quite useful. The Tianocore/EDK2 tree is divided in different packages. Each package has its own maintainer. The patches needs to be reviewed by the maintainer before to be committed. I cannot guarantee all these patches will be committed to the repository s

Re: UEFI on BeagleBoard qEmu

2011-07-11 Thread Loïc Minier
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011, Olivier Martin wrote: > The Tianocore/EDK2 tree is divided in different packages. Each package > has its own maintainer. The patches needs to be reviewed by the > maintainer before to be committed. What's the best way forward here? Opening a bug with each package and/or ma

RE: Minutes from Boot Architecture meeting today.

2011-07-11 Thread Jon Masters
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 11:32 +0100, Jason Parker wrote: > I am concerned that the group is trying to solve a problem that only Linaro > has. Namely how do I create a generic system to manage boot over multiple > boards with different boot loaders. I struggle to understand who else this > would help

RE: Minutes from Boot Architecture meeting today.

2011-07-11 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 15:04 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > So, it's not a problem if Linux support will be confined to Android or > the older "LSP" concept in which every board has a custom kernel, but > that's not really a scalable solution that allows for generic support. > It's really the same pro