SBBR has been superseded by Arm BBR. Update the about section to
reference BBR instead. However, none of the specification language
changes because EBBR has a relaxed set of UEFI requirements compared to
BBR.

Fixes: #62

Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca>
---
 source/chapter1-about.rst | 19 ++++++++-----------
 source/references.rst     |  6 +++---
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/source/chapter1-about.rst b/source/chapter1-about.rst
index 68a1abc..6f69f53 100644
--- a/source/chapter1-about.rst
+++ b/source/chapter1-about.rst
@@ -146,17 +146,14 @@ including services that are required for virtualization.
 It does not define a standardized abstract virtual machine view for a Guest
 Operating System.
 
-This specification is similar to the Arm Server Base Boot Requirements
-specification [SBBR]_ in that it defines the firmware interface presented to an
-operating system.
-SBBR is targeted at the server ecosystem and places strict requirements on the
-platform to ensure cross vendor interoperability.
-EBBR on the other hand allows more flexibility to support embedded designs
-which do not fit within the SBBR model.
-For example, a platform that isn't SBBR compliant because the SoC is only
-supported using Devicetree could be EBBR compliant, but not SBBR compliant.
-
-By definition, all SBBR compliant systems are also EBBR compliant, but the
+This specification is referenced by the Arm Base Boot Requirements
+Specification [ArmBBR]_ ยง 4.3.
+The UEFI requirements found in this document are similar but not identical to
+the requirements found in BBR.
+EBBR provides greater flexibility for support embedded designs which cannot
+easily meet the stricter BBR requirements.
+
+By definition, all BBR compliant systems are also EBBR compliant, but the
 converse is not true.
 
 Conventions Used in this Document
diff --git a/source/references.rst b/source/references.rst
index d91dc08..fb7dc81 100644
--- a/source/references.rst
+++ b/source/references.rst
@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@
    
<https://static.docs.arm.com/den0022/c/DEN0022C_Power_State_Coordination_Interface.pdf>`_
    30 January 2015, `Arm Limited <http://arm.com>`_
 
-.. [SBBR] `Arm Server Base Boot Requirements specification Issue B (v1.0)
-   
<https://static.docs.arm.com/den0044/b/DEN0044B_Server_Base_Boot_Requirements.pdf>`_
-   8 March 2016, `Arm Limited <http://arm.com>`_
+.. [ArmBBR] `Arm Base Boot Requirements specification Issue F (v1.0)
+   <https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0044/f>`_
+   6 Oct 2020, `Arm Limited <http://arm.com>`_
 
 .. [UEFI] `Unified Extensable Firmware Interface Specification v2.8 Errata A
    
<https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/UEFI_Spec_2_8_A_Feb14.pdf>`_,
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
boot-architecture mailing list
boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture

Reply via email to