To: Udit Kumar
> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel ; Architecture Mailman
> > List ; nd ;
> > arm.ebbr-discuss
> > Subject: Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] [RFC] uefi: Account for
> > SetVariable() not working at runtime
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 02:19:49PM +, Udit
: Thursday, July 12, 2018 8:20 PM
To: Udit Kumar
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel ; Architecture Mailman List
; nd ; arm.ebbr-discuss
Subject: Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] [RFC] uefi: Account for SetVariable() not
working
at runtime
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 02:19:49PM +, Udit Kumar wrote:
Do any existing
> > > From: Mark Brown [mailto:broo...@kernel.org]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 8:20 PM
> > > > To: Udit Kumar
> > > > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel ; Architecture Mailman
> > > > List
> > > > ; nd ;
> > > >
2, 2018 8:20 PM
> > > To: Udit Kumar
> > > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel ; Architecture Mailman List
> > > ; nd ; arm.ebbr-discuss
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] [RFC] uefi: Account for SetVariable() not
> > > working
> > > at
ailman List
> > ; nd ; arm.ebbr-discuss
> >
> > Subject: Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] [RFC] uefi: Account for SetVariable() not
> > working
> > at runtime
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 02:19:49PM +, Udit Kumar wrote:
> >
> > > > > Do any existing
Hi Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Brown [mailto:broo...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 8:20 PM
> To: Udit Kumar
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel ; Architecture Mailman List
> ; nd ; arm.ebbr-discuss
>
> Subject: Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] [RFC] uefi: Accou
On 12/07/2018 15:50, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 02:19:49PM +, Udit Kumar wrote:
Do any existing implementations change variables from non-volatile to
volatile?
The UEFI spec is explicit about which variables are volatile and which are not.
Simply relaxing non-volatile to v
On 12/07/2018 14:12, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 01:50:45PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:41:08AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
Add details on what to do if the platform is unable to set persistent
variables in runtime services. The idea here is that the Ge
Hi Ard
> > Do any existing implementations change variables from non-volatile to
> > volatile?
> >
>
> The UEFI spec is explicit about which variables are volatile and which are
> not.
> Simply relaxing non-volatile to volatile in the general case doesn't seem
> like a
> useful approach to me.
My 2 cents
> -Original Message-
> From: arm.ebbr-discuss-boun...@arm.com [mailto:arm.ebbr-discuss-
> boun...@arm.com] On Behalf Of Grant Likely
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 4:11 PM
> To: boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-disc...@arm.com
> Cc: n...@arm.com
> Subject: [Arm.ebb
On 12 July 2018 at 15:12, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 01:50:45PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>
>> The OS will discover the variable is non-modifiable when it tried to
>> set it. Won't the current proposal mislead standards compliant use of
>> GetVariable()? For example does it it
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:41:08AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> Add details on what to do if the platform is unable to set persistent
> variables in runtime services. The idea here is that the GetVariable()
> and SetVariable() APIs should continue to work, and the OS can obtain
> all the variable s
12 matches
Mail list logo
