Re: [Boston.pm] suppressing warnings

2013-05-04 Thread Greg London
is there a way to suppress this warning from inside testpackage.pm somehow? I've tried a bunch of things and still haven't found a solution. Is this not possible to do in per? Or is it so obvious I can't see it? Greg package file testpackage.pm: package testpackage; use warnings; use

Re: [Boston.pm] suppressing warnings

2013-05-04 Thread Jerrad Pierce
You can add some no-op-ish noise to sidestep the warning e.g; local $main::tricky; or use vars '$main::tricky'; ___ Boston-pm mailing list Boston-pm@mail.pm.org http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm

Re: [Boston.pm] suppressing warnings

2013-05-04 Thread Jordan Adler
Design issues aside, no warnings 'once'; Sent from my iPhone On May 4, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Greg London em...@greglondon.com wrote: is there a way to suppress this warning from inside testpackage.pm somehow? I've tried a bunch of things and still haven't found a solution. Is this not

Re: [Boston.pm] suppressing warnings

2013-05-04 Thread David Cantrell
On 04/05/2013 20:47, Greg London wrote: is there a way to suppress this warning from inside testpackage.pm somehow? ... #!/usr/bin/env perl use warnings; use strict; use testpackage; somesub('tricky'); print hello, tricky is '$main::tricky'\n; When I run this script, I get the warning: Name

Re: [Boston.pm] suppressing warnings

2013-05-04 Thread Jordan Adler
This pragma usage is lexically scoped, too. Sent from my iPhone On May 4, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Jordan Adler jordan.m.ad...@gmail.com wrote: Design issues aside, no warnings 'once'; Sent from my iPhone On May 4, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Greg London em...@greglondon.com wrote: is there a way

Re: [Boston.pm] suppressing warnings

2013-05-04 Thread Ben Tilly
If your module has an import method, and in that method calls warnings-unimport(once) then the unimport should be lexically scoped to where your package was used. Which in the normal case is the whole file, so it works. On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Jordan Adler jordan.m.ad...@gmail.com wrote: