hi all,
i sent ronald a job posting but he hasn't forwarded to the list yet. i
know ronald and bob clancy are the two who approved those. are they both
still interested in doing this? i wouldn't mind a bit of quicker
response as some of my leads are time sensitive. would anyone else want
the
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Uri Guttman u...@stemsystems.com wrote:
i sent ronald a job posting but he hasn't forwarded to the list yet. i know
ronald and bob clancy are the two who approved those. are they both still
interested in doing this? i wouldn't mind a bit of quicker response as
Bill Ricker wrote:
...we may make that an ongoing exemption from
moderation of job-posting in boston-pm for perhaps those trustees with
unmoderated boston-pm-announce privileges, not just Uri -- revocable
for violations of above 1-3. Discuss.
That sounds fair. The objective of moderation is
:Per discussion offlist between the Outgoing Facilitator and the
Incoming Facilitator, there is
NO CHANGE
in the Boston.PM Job Posting policy
(previously adopted by vote at a meeting whenver Rondald said it was.)
In particular, the screening address remains Ronald's [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As part of
i may be evil but not THAT evil! :)
Uri, it's not about any actual evil. I would really really like to say
Yes to your kind offer. But Sean and I have to worry about the
*perception* of evil even where it isn't.
Local companies, some of whom sponsor Boston.PM, expect postings to the
list via
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ben Tilly
Sent: Mon 6/30/2008 2:39 PM
To: Ricker, William
Cc: boston-pm@mail.pm.org; Sean Quinlan; Uri Guttman
Subject: Re: [Boston.pm] job postings
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Ricker, William
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i
William Ricker wrote:
Or we could consider a change of policy to just allow posting (with same
caveat of locality and relevance), thus avoiding the issue entirely.
Practically speaking, the list isn't moderated, so any job poster who is
conscientious enough to read the list policy and follow
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:38:02PM -0400, Tom Metro wrote:
As long as we provide a contact person that posters can consult with on
questionable items, self-moderation will probably be fine.
I support this model. It seems fairly simple. Given that the purpose of
moderation is to avoid abuse, we
OK, seems we have three votes for self-moderation...in other matters...
Ben Tilly wrote:
...regularly make a post listing any recent jobs.perl.org offerings
in the Boston area. The more I think about it, the better that option
looks. Particularly if you can write an automated script to search
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Uri Guttman wrote:
if someone else really wants to do it, fine with me but no one has
piped up about it.
Oh fer cryin' out loud, how hard can it be?
The conflict of interest here is obvious. Sorry, Uri, but there's no
getting around it. Fox guarding the henhouse and all
they are really clued in to Boston.PM, they will not know that
Uri is a headhunter. If they are clued in, they know enough about Uri
to not worry. Where is the problem?
There are a couple of other ways that an evil headhunter who was in
charge of the boston.pm job postings could use
CD == Chris Devers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CD On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Uri Guttman wrote:
if someone else really wants to do it, fine with me but no one has
piped up about it.
CD Oh fer cryin' out loud, how hard can it be?
CD The conflict of interest here is obvious. Sorry, Uri, but
TM == Tom Metro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TM OK, seems we have three votes for self-moderation...in other matters...
TM Ben Tilly wrote:
...regularly make a post listing any recent jobs.perl.org offerings
in the Boston area. The more I think about it, the better that option
looks.
I can see the potential conflict in interest in having someone who does
recruiting work handling the job postings. Obviously it is a concern to
some of our members.
Very few job postings I received were rejected. I often send them back to
the submitter for additional info. I reformatted most
From: Sean Quinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:22:22 -0400
Uri, as you offer professional recruiting services, I'm afraid this
might be a significant conflict of interests.
-Sean
This thought occurred to me, too, but I tend to agree with Uri. The
only real
BR == Bob Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BRFrom: Sean Quinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BRDate: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:22:22 -0400
BRUri, as you offer professional recruiting services, I'm afraid this
BRmight be a significant conflict of interests.
BR-Sean
BRSo even
hi all,
now that ronald has retired, one of his jobs that needs to be filled is
handling job postings here. i would like to volunteer for that task
especially as i am already in that business. i will adhere to the same
rules which is that the jobs must be perl-centric and in the boston area
and
17 matches
Mail list logo
