Re: [Bridge] Correct PVID behavior with bridge's VLAN filtering on/off?

On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 10:10:32AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Le 12/12/18 à 1:02 AM, Ido Schimmel a écrit : > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:48:21AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> Hi Nikolay, Roopa, Jiri, Ido, > >> > >> When a bridge has vlan_filtering=0 and notifies a switch driver

Re: [Bridge] Correct PVID behavior with bridge's VLAN filtering on/off?

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:52:08AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 12/12/18 1:02 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:48:21AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> Hi Nikolay, Roopa, Jiri, Ido, > >> > >> When a bridge has vlan_filtering=0 and notifies a switch driver through >

Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next] Documentation: networking: Clarify switchdev devices behavior

From: Florian Fainelli Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:09:43 -0800 > This patch provides details on the expected behavior of switchdev > enabled network devices when operating in a "stand alone" mode, as well > as when being bridge members. This clarifies a number of things that > recently came up

Re: [Bridge] Correct PVID behavior with bridge's VLAN filtering on/off?

Le 12/12/18 à 1:02 AM, Ido Schimmel a écrit : > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:48:21AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> Hi Nikolay, Roopa, Jiri, Ido, >> >> When a bridge has vlan_filtering=0 and notifies a switch driver through >> HOST_OBJ_MDB about MC addresses that the CPU/management port is >>