On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 04:35:09PM +0200, Allan W. Nielsen wrote:
> The 07/29/2019 17:21, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > On 29/07/2019 16:52, Allan W. Nielsen wrote:
> > > The 07/29/2019 15:50, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > >> On 29/07/2019 15:22, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > >>> Hi Allan,
> >
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 12:28:41 +0300
> On initialization failure we have to delete the local fdb which was
> inserted due to the default pvid creation. This problem has been present
> since the inception of default_pvid. Note that currently there are 2 cases:
> 1) in
The 07/29/2019 17:21, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 29/07/2019 16:52, Allan W. Nielsen wrote:
> > The 07/29/2019 15:50, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> >> On 29/07/2019 15:22, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> >>> Hi Allan,
> >>> On 29/07/2019 15:14, Allan W. Nielsen wrote:
> First of all, as
On 29/07/2019 16:52, Allan W. Nielsen wrote:
> The 07/29/2019 15:50, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> On 29/07/2019 15:22, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>> Hi Allan,
>>> On 29/07/2019 15:14, Allan W. Nielsen wrote:
First of all, as mentioned further down in this thread, I realized that our
The 07/29/2019 15:50, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 29/07/2019 15:22, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > Hi Allan,
> > On 29/07/2019 15:14, Allan W. Nielsen wrote:
> >> First of all, as mentioned further down in this thread, I realized that our
> >> implementation of the multicast floodmasks does
On 29/07/2019 16:14, Allan W. Nielsen wrote:
> The 07/29/2019 15:22, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> Yes, all of the multicast code is handled differently, it doesn't go through
>> the fdb
>> lookup or code at all. I don't see how you'll do a lookup in the fdb table
>> with a
>> multicast mac
On 29/07/2019 15:22, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> Hi Allan,
> On 29/07/2019 15:14, Allan W. Nielsen wrote:
>> Hi Nikolay,
>>
>> First of all, as mentioned further down in this thread, I realized that our
>> implementation of the multicast floodmasks does not align with the existing
>> SW
>>
Hi Ido,
The 07/29/2019 09:09, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> External E-Mail
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 09:15:59PM +0200, Allan W. Nielsen wrote:
> > If we assume that the SwitchDev driver implemented such that all multicast
> > traffic goes to the CPU, then we should really have a way to install a
Hi Allan,
On 29/07/2019 15:14, Allan W. Nielsen wrote:
> Hi Nikolay,
>
> First of all, as mentioned further down in this thread, I realized that our
> implementation of the multicast floodmasks does not align with the existing SW
> implementation. We will change this, such that all multicast
Hi Nikolay,
First of all, as mentioned further down in this thread, I realized that our
implementation of the multicast floodmasks does not align with the existing SW
implementation. We will change this, such that all multicast packets goes to the
SW bridge.
This changes things a bit, not that
On initialization failure we have to delete the local fdb which was
inserted due to the default pvid creation. This problem has been present
since the inception of default_pvid. Note that currently there are 2 cases:
1) in br_dev_init() when br_multicast_init() fails
2) if register_netdevice()
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 09:15:59PM +0200, Allan W. Nielsen wrote:
> If we assume that the SwitchDev driver implemented such that all multicast
> traffic goes to the CPU, then we should really have a way to install a HW
> offload path in the silicon, such that these packets does not go to the CPU
12 matches
Mail list logo
