From: Horatiu Vultur
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 09:55:41 +
> The issue was reported by syzbot. When the function br_mrp_parse was
> called with a valid net_bridge_port, the net_bridge was an invalid
> pointer. Therefore the check br->stp_enabled could pass/fail
> depending where it was pointing
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 01:14:35PM +, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The 05/25/2020 13:26, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> > content is safe
> >
> > On 25/05/2020 13:03, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at
The 05/25/2020 13:26, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On 25/05/2020 13:03, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:28:27AM +, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > [...]
> >> My first approach was
On 25/05/2020 13:03, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:28:27AM +, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> [...]
>> My first approach was to extend the 'struct br_mrp_instance' with a field
>> that
>> contains the priority of the node. But this breaks the backwards
>> compatibility,
>> and
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:28:27AM +, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
[...]
> My first approach was to extend the 'struct br_mrp_instance' with a field that
> contains the priority of the node. But this breaks the backwards
> compatibility,
> and then every time when I need to change something, I will
The 05/25/2020 12:33, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On 25/05/2020 14:28, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While I was working on adding support for MRA role to MRP, I noticed that I
> > might
On 25/05/2020 14:28, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While I was working on adding support for MRA role to MRP, I noticed that I
> might have some issues with the netlink interface, so it would be great if you
> can give me an advice on how to continue.
>
> First a node with MRA role can behave
Hi,
While I was working on adding support for MRA role to MRP, I noticed that I
might have some issues with the netlink interface, so it would be great if you
can give me an advice on how to continue.
First a node with MRA role can behave as a MRM(Manager) or as a
MRC(Client). The behaviour is
On 25/05/2020 12:55, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The issue was reported by syzbot. When the function br_mrp_parse was
> called with a valid net_bridge_port, the net_bridge was an invalid
> pointer. Therefore the check br->stp_enabled could pass/fail
> depending where it was pointing in memory.
> The
The issue was reported by syzbot. When the function br_mrp_parse was
called with a valid net_bridge_port, the net_bridge was an invalid
pointer. Therefore the check br->stp_enabled could pass/fail
depending where it was pointing in memory.
The fix consists of setting the net_bridge pointer if the
10 matches
Mail list logo