On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 08:19:37AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 07:09:42PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > > > I started this patch when I saw there is not limit for setting
> > > > multicast_membership_interval to 0, which will cause bridge remove the
> > > >
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:02:01 +0800
Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 07:09:42PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > > I started this patch when I saw there is not limit for setting
> > > multicast_membership_interval to 0, which will cause bridge remove the
> > > mdb directly after
On 20/10/2021 15:10, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 06:19:25PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:49:17PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>> Nacked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov
>>>
>>> I think we just discussed this a day ago? It is the same problem -
>>> while we
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 06:19:25PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:49:17PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > Nacked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov
> >
> > I think we just discussed this a day ago? It is the same problem -
> > while we all agree the values should follow the
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:49:17PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> Nacked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov
>
> I think we just discussed this a day ago? It is the same problem -
> while we all agree the values should follow the RFC, users have had
> the option to set any values forever (even non-RFC
On 20/10/2021 05:40, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Based on RFC3376 8.3:
> The number of seconds represented by the [Query Response Interval]
> must be less than the [Query Interval].
>
> Fixes: d902eee43f19 ("bridge: Add multicast count/interval sysfs entries")
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu
> ---
>
