Re: [Bridge] [PATCH] Revert "net: linkwatch: add check for netdevice being present to linkwatch_do_dev"

2020-09-20 Thread Nikolay Aleksandrov
On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 09:40 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi David, > > CC bridge > > On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 3:34 AM David Miller wrote: > > From: Geert Uytterhoeven > > Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 14:33:59 +0200 > > > > > "dev" is not the bridge device, but the physical Ethernet interface,

Re: [Bridge] [PATCH] Revert "net: linkwatch: add check for netdevice being present to linkwatch_do_dev"

2020-09-18 Thread David Miller
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:35:02 + > Thanks for the analysis, I don't see any issues with checking if the device > isn't present. It will have to go through some testing, but no obvious > objections/issues. Have you tried if it fixes your case? > I have briefly gone

Re: [Bridge] [PATCH] Revert "net: linkwatch: add check for netdevice being present to linkwatch_do_dev"

2020-09-14 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi David, CC bridge On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 3:34 AM David Miller wrote: > From: Geert Uytterhoeven > Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 14:33:59 +0200 > > > "dev" is not the bridge device, but the physical Ethernet interface, which > > may already be suspended during s2ram. > > Hmmm, ok. > > Looking more