On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 23:10:28 -0400
Oleg Drokin wrote:
> %ul would print an unsigned value and a letter l,
> likely it was %lu that was meant to print the long int,
> but in reality the values printed there are just regular signed
> ints, so just dropping the l altogether.
>
On Aug 27, 2016, at 12:18 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 8/27/2016 6:58 PM, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>
%ul would print an unsigned value and a letter l,
likely it was %lu that was meant to print the long int,
but in reality the values printed there are just regular signed
On Aug 27, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 8/27/2016 6:10 AM, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>
>> %ul would print an unsigned value and a letter l,
>> likely it was %lu that was meant to print the long int,
>> but in reality the values printed there are just regular signed
>
>
%ul would print an unsigned value and a letter l,
likely it was %lu that was meant to print the long int,
but in reality the values printed there are just regular signed
ints, so just dropping the l altogether.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c | 2 +-
Hello.
On 8/27/2016 6:58 PM, Oleg Drokin wrote:
%ul would print an unsigned value and a letter l,
likely it was %lu that was meant to print the long int,
but in reality the values printed there are just regular signed
Signed? Then you need probably "%d" or "%i"…
They are signed in the