On 2025-06-02 18:25, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 04:00:14PM +0300, Ilya K wrote:
>> That's weird, because I do have all the patches applied. I think this may
>> have been broken by the pcs_inband_caps changes, because without the patch
>> I'm just getting "autoneg setti
From: Yong Wang
[ Upstream commit 4b30ae9adb047dd0a7982975ec3933c529537026 ]
When a bridge port STP state is changed from BLOCKING/DISABLED to
FORWARDING, the port's igmp query timer will NOT re-arm itself if the
bridge has been configured as per-VLAN multicast snooping.
Solve this by choosing
From: Yong Wang
[ Upstream commit 4b30ae9adb047dd0a7982975ec3933c529537026 ]
When a bridge port STP state is changed from BLOCKING/DISABLED to
FORWARDING, the port's igmp query timer will NOT re-arm itself if the
bridge has been configured as per-VLAN multicast snooping.
Solve this by choosing
From: Yong Wang
[ Upstream commit 6c131043eaf1be2a6cc2d228f92ceb626fbcc0f3 ]
When the vlan STP state is changed, which could be manipulated by
"bridge vlan" commands, similar to port STP state, this also impacts
multicast behaviors such as igmp query. In the scenario of per-VLAN
snooping, there'
From: Yong Wang
[ Upstream commit 6c131043eaf1be2a6cc2d228f92ceb626fbcc0f3 ]
When the vlan STP state is changed, which could be manipulated by
"bridge vlan" commands, similar to port STP state, this also impacts
multicast behaviors such as igmp query. In the scenario of per-VLAN
snooping, there'
From: Yong Wang
[ Upstream commit 4b30ae9adb047dd0a7982975ec3933c529537026 ]
When a bridge port STP state is changed from BLOCKING/DISABLED to
FORWARDING, the port's igmp query timer will NOT re-arm itself if the
bridge has been configured as per-VLAN multicast snooping.
Solve this by choosing
From: Yong Wang
[ Upstream commit 6c131043eaf1be2a6cc2d228f92ceb626fbcc0f3 ]
When the vlan STP state is changed, which could be manipulated by
"bridge vlan" commands, similar to port STP state, this also impacts
multicast behaviors such as igmp query. In the scenario of per-VLAN
snooping, there'
From: Yong Wang
[ Upstream commit 6c131043eaf1be2a6cc2d228f92ceb626fbcc0f3 ]
When the vlan STP state is changed, which could be manipulated by
"bridge vlan" commands, similar to port STP state, this also impacts
multicast behaviors such as igmp query. In the scenario of per-VLAN
snooping, there'
From: Yong Wang
[ Upstream commit 6c131043eaf1be2a6cc2d228f92ceb626fbcc0f3 ]
When the vlan STP state is changed, which could be manipulated by
"bridge vlan" commands, similar to port STP state, this also impacts
multicast behaviors such as igmp query. In the scenario of per-VLAN
snooping, there'
From: Yong Wang
[ Upstream commit 4b30ae9adb047dd0a7982975ec3933c529537026 ]
When a bridge port STP state is changed from BLOCKING/DISABLED to
FORWARDING, the port's igmp query timer will NOT re-arm itself if the
bridge has been configured as per-VLAN multicast snooping.
Solve this by choosing
From: Yong Wang
[ Upstream commit 4b30ae9adb047dd0a7982975ec3933c529537026 ]
When a bridge port STP state is changed from BLOCKING/DISABLED to
FORWARDING, the port's igmp query timer will NOT re-arm itself if the
bridge has been configured as per-VLAN multicast snooping.
Solve this by choosing
From: Yong Wang
[ Upstream commit 4b30ae9adb047dd0a7982975ec3933c529537026 ]
When a bridge port STP state is changed from BLOCKING/DISABLED to
FORWARDING, the port's igmp query timer will NOT re-arm itself if the
bridge has been configured as per-VLAN multicast snooping.
Solve this by choosing
12 matches
Mail list logo
