* Doug Pensinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Sometime listmember Brad DeLong's take:
http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/
Why Am I Not For Bush's Social Security Reform?
Thanks, Doug. That's a good summary of Brad's opinion. Here's an even
shorter version (my words, based on what
In a message dated 1/12/2005 10:57:46 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good news, Julia, glad to hear it. You seem to be in better spirits as
well.
--
Doug
I'm not a drinking man, but if you have a well full of spirits, I'd suggest
that you never light a match
On Jan 13, 2005, at 3:32 AM, Erik Reuter wrote:
That's a reasonable argument. But I think it is premature. Bush said he
will release an actual plan in February. If the plan is bad, or if it
looks okay but still seems likely Bush will screw up the implementation
of the plan, then it would be
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: Social Security
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:52:13PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote:
The private investment part of social security
* Dan Minette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
But, I think they are doing funny math. Let me do a back of the envelope:
No, you are calculating a different quantity. As I said in my post, the
figures are lifetime net tax rate. Basically, the percentage of income
you pay in taxes net of the benefits
I love the view from my back porch, it is over a wooded river that is
usually about 10 inches deep and 30 feet wide on bedrock. The bank is about
10 feet over the riverbed. I live about 7 miles below a small county dam.
Today I got calls from several people at work because they had heard that my
* Dan Minette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
(taxes paid to government over one's lifetime- cash benefits received
from government over ones lifetime)/total income over one's lifetime.
I just realized the source of the difference. We are both writing out
the formula for lifetime net tax rate, but
Julia wrote:
Doc says that Tommy appears to have a virus. Antibiotics are
*not* in
order at all (which is just as well, I'd worry about how his stomach
would take it). We need to monitor his temperature and bring him bck
tomorrow if it's too high. Doc is also very pleased that
- Original Message -
From: Ritu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Killer Bs Discussion' brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 10:44 PM
Subject: RE: Update on Tommy
Ah, if anyone else can handle vomiting, that's always good. :)
True. :)
30 years ago, that was the one thing I
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 9:45 PM
Subject: Re: Social Security
* Dan Minette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
(taxes paid to government over one's lifetime- cash benefits received
More from DeLong:
Violating the Constitution
Max Sawicky watches the Republican clown show continue:
MaxSpeak, You Listen!: LENINIST-OLIGARCH EXPROPRIATIONIST WATCH: This is
becoming too frequent a feature. It never pays to underestimate the
craven, reactionary mendacity of the Grand Old Party.
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:17:22 -0500, Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
answering portions of my post
* Gary Denton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
---
Expense TICKER
Ratio
===
0.09%ETSPX
Sorry - http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=ETSPX shows the expense
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:40:50 -0500, Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gary Denton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You have no clue do you?
Do you even know how to read? I wrote that the budget has been in almost
continuous deficit for the last 30 years. You say that I am wrong
because
13 matches
Mail list logo
