Counting

(Replies to plug-discuss preferred) best viewed monospaced 0th item: 0 places: 0 parity combinations, 2^0 possible nil:nil: 1 :1 1th item: 2 places: 01 10 2 parity combinations,

Re: quantum darwin?

Warren Ockrassa wrote: What's funny is that I regularly sense a strong commitment to QM (not just in you), one that isn't comfortable with conceding that, since QM is incomplete, it's possible that some of its conclusions are false. Almost as though it's a religion. So what about

Re: Counting

Trent Shipley wrote: What the I can't find any context for this. But see comments, below. ---David ... 2th item: 4 places: 0011 0101 0110 1001 1010 1100

Physics query

What in the universe has a temperature of around 1.9*10^11? (C or K, take your pick.) Julia ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Hilarious spoof

Have a look at: http://www.stiftungleostrauss.com/t00324fpt036/index.html Hilarious and very well done. Including images from Nuremberg rallies, illuminating the ultimate irony... that an intellectual refugee from ravaged Europe would come over here in the 40s and start preaching FOR the same

Re: Physics query

* Julia Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: What in the universe has a temperature of around 1.9*10^11? (C or K, take your pick.) According to Wien's law, the peak emission wavelength of a blackbody at temperature T is lambda = 0.29 cm-K / T So the peak wavelength of a blackbody at 1.9e11

Re: quantum darwin?

On Mar 3, 2005, at 11:24 PM, Dan Minette wrote: But, you miss why QM is defended as it is. The reaction is as though you said but evolution is just a theory. What would be helpful in thinking about this is asking why Feynman's response was to say shut up and calculate instead of pursuing the

Re: quantum darwin?

On Mar 4, 2005, at 4:26 AM, Robert Seeberger wrote: Warren Ockrassa wrote: What's funny is that I regularly sense a strong commitment to QM (not just in you), one that isn't comfortable with conceding that, since QM is incomplete, it's possible that some of its conclusions are false. Almost as

[aztechlist] Counting

(Replies to plug-discuss preferred) best viewed monospaced 0th item: 0 places: 0 parity combinations, 2^0 possible nil:nil: 1 :1 1th item: 2 places: 01 10 2 parity combinations,

Re: br1n:quantum darwin?

Dan Minette wrote: David, Do you happen to know what physics journal this work is in? Or hasn't the journal article come out yet? I've read some of their stuff on decoherence a few years ago and found it to be rather interesting. Thanks, Dan M. Dan-- The discussion seems to have wandered by now.

Re: Tits (a womans perspective)

On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 19:01:35 +, William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brings to mind the Rammstein song 'Amerika' which has a great pun on Wonderbra/wunderbar. Women have become so fixated on not withering, they've forgotten that there are infinite ways to be beautiful. NYT - M Dowd

I think it's a parody

http://www.udargo.com/burton/Tsunami/ xponent Foxes News Maru rob ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: I think it's a parody

Robert G. Seeberger wrote: http://www.udargo.com/burton/Tsunami/ xponent Foxes News Maru rob ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l Crazy like a fox man- crazy funny! ~Maru ___

Re: I think it's a parody

Robert G. Seeberger wrote: http://www.udargo.com/burton/Tsunami/ You really think so? Do you mean that Fox really doesn't have Jimmy Stewart as a reporter? The sad thing is tha they didn't go all that far from the truth. I especially love the ticker, but it's also almost too true: Economy

Re: I think it's a parody

At 12:03 AM Saturday 3/5/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert G. Seeberger wrote: http://www.udargo.com/burton/Tsunami/ You really think so? Do you mean that Fox really doesn't have Jimmy Stewart as a reporter? The sad thing is tha they didn't go all that far from the truth. Humor: it is a