Greetings Gautam,
Thank you for your response. I appreciate the level headed tone and
reasonable queries. And for giving this a much-needed new thread
label.
Conspiracies theories, are just that until proven and are by
necessity vague to some depth. I am earnestly seeking answers and
Gautam, et al,
Sometimes, my wife says of herself, I don't know how you can stand to
be around me: _I_ can barely take it. That's a little how I feel about
myself and my recent interest in all the 9/11 conspiracies: I can hardly
stand to be around myself when I get caught up in it.
After
--- Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm writing to apologize for being such a pompous
ass. Also to state
that my current position on the whole thing is that
whoever it was who
plotted to bring down the WTC buildings succeeded in
a manner so
spectacular that it must have surprised even
I'm going to move a few things in Jonathan's post around a bit to try to
organize a response on what I think is a key to the discussion. That is,
how one evaluates opinions.
The first thing I want to address is the idea that folks who have the
knowledge needed to demonstrate something is clearly
--- Gibson Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no idea if your accomplished friend is in on
anything. If I had
I would have directly said so. I wasn't trying to
besmirch her, I was
pointing out many people accept a
go-along-to-get-along mentality and
yet others find this quite
On 16 Sep 2006, at 9:12PM, Dave Land wrote:
After watching the Pyroclastic video that WTG pointed to,
Not me.
Just to clear that up Maru
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
Theists cannot be trusted
Dan Minette wrote:
...
When scientists tracked one of the interplanetary probes, the found an
anomaly in its orbit. After doing exhaustive work ruling out the
conventional explanations that they could think of, and after discussing it
with colleagues, they published the anomaly. For a year,
