http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/space/05/01/death.in.space.ap/index.html
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
(http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/space/05/01/death.in.space.ap/index.html)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
(This is peculiar. Hope it works this time.)
http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/space/05/01/death.in.space.ap/index.html
-- Ronn! :)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
(This is peculiar. Hope it works this time.)
Which part? The triple post or the link? :-p
Jim
I'm a doctor, not a bricklayer Maru
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
On Behalf Of Robert Seeberger
But overall, this story changes my perception of the
potential success
rate of conspiracies and the ability to keep them out of the public
consciousness for long periods.
Maybe. But it definitely illustrates that if you want to keep a
conspiracy like this
As Steve said,
The Brin-L weekly chat has been a list tradition for over six
years. Way back on 27 May, 1998, Marco Maisenhelder first set
up a chatroom for the list, and on the next day, he established
a weekly chat time. We've been through several servers, chat
technologies, and even casts of
At 10:04 AM Wednesday 5/2/2007, Jim Sharkey wrote:
Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
(This is peculiar. Hope it works this time.)
Which part? The triple post or the link? :-p
That when the message came back here on the list it was entirely
blank the first two times, which is why I re-sent it. Did
