RE: An interesting response

2008-04-17 Thread Dan M
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hkhenson Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 8:10 PM To: brin-l@mccmedia.com Subject: An interesting response At 12:00 PM 4/16/2008, Dan M wrote: (Keith wrote) At 12:00 PM 4/11/2008, Dan M

Re: An interesting response

2008-04-17 Thread hkhenson
At 12:00 PM 4/17/2008, Dan M wrote: Nothing works 100% of the time, but lets assume a 95% efficiency, or running 8322 hours/year. The cost is, then, about $39 per kWh. If you do it this way, the cost the next year is zero. That's not good accounting. These things should run for decades. If

Re: An interesting response

2008-04-17 Thread Lance A. Brown
hkhenson said the following on 4/17/2008 5:16 PM: At 12:00 PM 4/17/2008, Dan M wrote: And what kind of a deal would the Russians give you if you wanted to launch 110 of these a day? Perhaps this is naive of me, but who is going to want to build the multiple launching facilities 110