RE: [Brin-l] RE: Changeover... topic identifiers?

2002-09-23 Thread Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLWPD/RZO/BOZO
-Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Kevin Tarr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: zondag 22 september 2002 18:19 Aan: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Onderwerp: RE: [Brin-l] RE: Changeover... topic identifiers? File: ATT0.txt; charset = Windows-1252 I get your messages this way

Re: [Brin-l] RE: Changeover... topic identifiers?

2002-09-22 Thread Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
Adrian Hon wrote: From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] The message I am replying to shows John D. Giorgis in the from field. Since several people are on several lists I am on, it would not be possible to identify Brin-l without the [Brin-l]. Kinda sucks no matter which way you

Re: [Brin-l] RE: Changeover... topic identifiers?

2002-09-22 Thread Ray Ludenia
Robert Seeberger wrote: In any case I have all the culture mail as maroon in my inbox. Easy to read the text in that color! G. What's wrong with puce? :-) Ray. ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: [Brin-l] RE: Changeover... topic identifiers?

2002-09-21 Thread Erik Reuter
Try Sender:, I find it to be reliable and robust. And I think you may be in the minority on liking the [Brin-l] in the subject. It is redundant, and I still haven't seen a clear reason for having it. Unless you are somehow unable to filter on the Sender: field?? On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at

Re: [Brin-l] RE: Changeover... topic identifiers?

2002-09-21 Thread Julia Thompson
Erik Reuter wrote: Try Sender:, I find it to be reliable and robust. And I think you may be in the minority on liking the [Brin-l] in the subject. It is redundant, and I still haven't seen a clear reason for having it. Unless you are somehow unable to filter on the Sender: field?? The

Re: [Brin-l] RE: Changeover... topic identifiers?

2002-09-21 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 09:35:22AM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote: If you'd like to try to talk me through setting up procmail filters on a Linux machine when I have absolutely no clue as to what I'm doing, you may very well convince me that I don't need it. :) Procmail filters are simple, you

Re: [Brin-l] RE: Changeover... topic identifiers?

2002-09-21 Thread Adrian Hon
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] The message I am replying to shows John D. Giorgis in the from field. Since several people are on several lists I am on, it would not be possible to identify Brin-l without the [Brin-l]. Kinda sucks no matter which way you go. But then how do you

Re: [Brin-l] RE: Changeover... topic identifiers?

2002-09-21 Thread Adrian Hon
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] If there is a way to identify the Culture mails, I would appreciate someone passing it on so I can colorise them. I like being able to pay greater attention to the HOT topics, and Brin-L and Culture seem to take turns being HOT most of the time. You

Re: [Brin-l] RE: Changeover... topic identifiers?

2002-09-21 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: Adrian Hon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 12:32 PM Subject: Re: [Brin-l] RE: Changeover... topic identifiers? From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can identify them by the To: field having [EMAIL

Re: [Brin-l] RE: Changeover... topic identifiers?

2002-09-21 Thread Deborah Harrell
--- David Hobby wrote: John D. Giorgis wrote: ... An alternative, that I would actually prefer is to remove the Brin-L header from general list postings, and only have identifiers for special topics... That raises a good question. Is anyone actually using those [Brin-L] things in