RE: Pioneer anomaly, was: Re: 9-11 conspiricy theories

2006-09-28 Thread Dan Minette
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Hobby Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 7:56 PM To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: Pioneer anomaly, was: Re: 9-11 conspiricy theories Dan Minette wrote: ... When scientists tracked one

Re: 9-11 conspiricy theories

2006-09-17 Thread Charlie Bell
On 17/09/2006, at 9:12 AM, Dan Minette wrote: The first thing I want to address is the idea that folks who have the knowledge needed to demonstrate something is clearly wrong with an official report fail to do so out of fear of losing work because they are lumped with the tinfoil hat

9-11 conspiricy theories

2006-09-16 Thread Dan Minette
I'm going to move a few things in Jonathan's post around a bit to try to organize a response on what I think is a key to the discussion. That is, how one evaluates opinions. The first thing I want to address is the idea that folks who have the knowledge needed to demonstrate something is clearly

Pioneer anomaly, was: Re: 9-11 conspiricy theories

2006-09-16 Thread David Hobby
Dan Minette wrote: ... When scientists tracked one of the interplanetary probes, the found an anomaly in its orbit. After doing exhaustive work ruling out the conventional explanations that they could think of, and after discussing it with colleagues, they published the anomaly. For a year,