PAT MATHEWS wrote:
Someone on FourthTurning came up with a very sensible idea. It was
that the only time the federal government should interfere with state
law is if the state is violating the Bill of Rights. (This does not
restrict the power of the feds to regulate air traffic, public
David Land wrote:
I wonder which state will receive the most attention on Tuesday
evening. The one whose population almost elected him once and
barely did
a second time, or the one that he invaded without provocation?
I'm not taking any bets, because I'm fairly certain it's the latter.
Someone on FourthTurning came up with a very sensible idea. It was that the
only time the federal government should interfere with state law is if the
state is violating the Bill of Rights. (This does not restrict the power of
the feds to regulate air traffic, public health, etc...we're
PAT wrote:
Someone on FourthTurning came up with a very sensible idea. It was that
the only time the federal government should interfere with state law is
if the state is violating the Bill of Rights. (This does not restrict
the power of the feds to regulate air traffic, public health,
etc
From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAT wrote:
Someone on FourthTurning came up with a very sensible idea. It was that
the only time the federal government should interfere with state law is if
the state is violating the Bill of Rights. (This does not restrict the
power of the feds
