On 15 Oct 2008 at 11:37, William T Goodall wrote:
It's been very quiet here since the thought police manifesto.
Obvious Maru
You posted a Manifesto?
AndrewC
Yes, I went there Maru
Dawn Falcon
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 15 Oct 2008, at 12:34, William T Goodall wrote:
On 15 Oct 2008, at 02:04, David Hobby wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
On 20 Aug 2008, at 16:10, William T Goodall wrote:
I'm growing increasingly concerned that you are trying to use your
position on the list to intimidate and silence
On 15 Oct 2008, at 02:04, David Hobby wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
On 20 Aug 2008, at 16:10, William T Goodall wrote:
I'm growing increasingly concerned that you are trying to use your
position on the list to intimidate and silence those with whom you
do
not agree and that this
Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
At 09:18 PM Tuesday 10/14/2008, Kevin B. O'Brien wrote:
At this point I cannot rule out some stupid technical problem, like a
message that got caught in a queue somewhere and just now shook loose.
It *does* happen sometimes.
I wondered if that was what
At 09:18 PM Tuesday 10/14/2008, Kevin B. O'Brien wrote:
At this point I cannot rule out some stupid technical problem, like a
message that got caught in a queue somewhere and just now shook loose.
It *does* happen sometimes.
I wondered if that was what happened.
History Repeats Itself
William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
I don't know who wrote:
snippage
I'm growing increasingly concerned that you are trying to use your
position on the list to intimidate and silence those with whom you
do not agree and that this behaviour could be
On 15 Oct 2008, at 02:04, David Hobby wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
On 20 Aug 2008, at 16:10, William T Goodall wrote:
I'm growing increasingly concerned that you are trying to use your
position on the list to intimidate and silence those with whom you
do
not agree and that this
On 20 Aug 2008, at 16:10, William T Goodall wrote:
I'm growing increasingly concerned that you are trying to use your
position on the list to intimidate and silence those with whom you do
not agree and that this behaviour could be offensive to some who might
otherwise participate.
Seems I
William T Goodall wrote:
On 20 Aug 2008, at 16:10, William T Goodall wrote:
I'm growing increasingly concerned that you are trying to use your
position on the list to intimidate and silence those with whom you do
not agree and that this behaviour could be offensive to some who might
otherwise
Non sequitur?
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Nick Wrote
Non sequitur?
I bet Willie will insist that it was a sequitur.
Dan M.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Dan M wrote:
Nick Wrote
Non sequitur?
I bet Willie will insist that it was a sequitur.
Dan M.
At this point I cannot rule out some stupid technical problem, like a
message that got caught in a queue somewhere and just now shook loose.
It *does* happen sometimes.
Regards,
Kevin B. O'Brien wrote:
At this point I cannot rule out some stupid technical problem, like a
message that got caught in a queue somewhere and just now shook loose.
It *does* happen sometimes.
No, I think he means that the financial system crashed because
the USA abandoned God and became an
Nick Arnett wrote:
Your anti-religious postings are trivial. That's the problem. Science
versus religion is a perfectly reasonable topic here. That's not what
you're offering us.
I think I am seeing both sides to some degree. I have unsubbed from
other lists because of people who
William T Goodall wrote:
I think it's clear than Nick's behaviour here is quite inappropriate
and deserves censure in the strongest terms. What happened to IAAMOAC?
It's clear Nick doesn't like my opinions. It's even clearer that
he's abusing his position in the most egregious manner
William T Goodall wrote:
On 20 Aug 2008, at 15:12, Nick Arnett wrote:
William,
This is not a discussion list about religion. I don't think we've
ever
moderated anybody for frequent off-topic posting, but I'm growing
increasingly concerned that many of your postings are a distraction
William,
If you have something new to contribute to the discussion, I, for one,
welcome it.
If you have more of the same with which to spam the list, then I, for
one, do not.
I know that I can simply skip or delete your messages, but where is
the spirit of IAAMOAC, forcing your fellow
On 20 Aug 2008, at 21:04, Dave Land wrote:
William,
If you have something new to contribute to the discussion, I, for one,
welcome it.
Newness is a rather high standard to set. Most of the arguments are
quite old but still not settled.
If you have more of the same with which to spam
On 21/08/2008, at 7:48 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
Newness is a rather high standard to set. Most of the arguments are
quite old but still not settled.
But you're not arguing, you're just posting third party articles that
reinforce your worldview.
The silent majority on the list love
William T Goodall wrote:
On 20 Aug 2008, at 16:13, Olin Elliott wrote:
By that description, 99% of the postings are off topic.
And I'm not even the most frequent poster!
You are, however, the most monotonous and boring.
--
Kevin B. O'Brien TANSTAAFL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 21 Aug 2008, at 11:04, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 21/08/2008, at 7:48 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
Newness is a rather high standard to set. Most of the arguments are
quite old but still not settled.
But you're not arguing, you're just posting third party articles that
reinforce your
On 21 Aug 2008, at 00:47, Kevin B. O'Brien wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
On 20 Aug 2008, at 16:13, Olin Elliott wrote:
By that description, 99% of the postings are off topic.
And I'm not even the most frequent poster!
You are, however, the most monotonous and boring.
I like to
: Re: Apology (was Re: Off-topic., monotonous posting (was
Child-killing religion))
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:55:55 +0100
On 21 Aug 2008, at 11:04, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 21/08/2008, at 7:48 PM, William T Goodall wrote:
Newness is a rather high standard to set. Most
On 21 Aug 2008, at 14:07, Pat Mathews wrote:
I can't speak for other members of the list's silent majority. I,
for one, see another news article on some cult or its members run
amok,yawn, and hit Delete.
Just thought you'd want to know.
What makes you think you're part of the list's
At 08:38 AM Thursday 8/21/2008, William T Goodall wrote:
On 21 Aug 2008, at 14:07, Pat Mathews wrote:
I can't speak for other members of the list's silent majority. I,
for one, see another news article on some cult or its members run
amok,yawn, and hit Delete.
Just thought you'd want
Pat Mathews wrote:
I can't speak for other members of the list's silent majority. I, for
one, see another news article on some cult or its members run
amok,yawn, and hit Delete.
Ditto.
--[Lance]
--
GPG Fingerprint: 409B A409 A38D 92BF 15D9 6EEE 9A82 F2AC 69AC 07B9
CACert.org Assurer
Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
If they are indeed _silent_, what makes you think they agree with you?
He's a mind reader. Doesn't believe in religion, but does believe in
telepathy. :-)
The Amazing William Maru
--[Lance]
--
GPG Fingerprint: 409B A409 A38D 92BF 15D9 6EEE 9A82 F2AC 69AC 07B9
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Lance A. Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
If they are indeed _silent_, what makes you think they agree with you?
He's a mind reader. Doesn't believe in religion, but does believe in
telepathy. :-)
The Amazing William Maru
LOL!
I haven't weighed in on this yet because I'm sort of a newbie on this
list, and there's probably history to this that I'm missing, but I'm
very familiar with lists where I'm not especailly interested in (or
necessarily agree with) every post I get on every list. Some are
offensive, some
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Bruce Bostwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
William's objection
seems to be that the decision to moderate him
There has been no such decision. We remain extremely reluctant to moderate
anybody, for the very reasons you cite.
There is discussion, which is
On 21 Aug 2008, at 16:19, Bruce Bostwick wrote:
I haven't weighed in on this yet because I'm sort of a newbie on this
list, and there's probably history to this that I'm missing, but I'm
very familiar with lists where I'm not especailly interested in (or
necessarily agree with) every post I
William T Goodall wrote:
There are no 'technical or procedural' reasons for objecting to my
posts on the matter of religion: it's an attempt by some to silence
the expression of views they don't like plain and simple.
Are you kidding? This is entirely about technical/procedural
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: Apology (was Re: Off-topic.,monotonous posting (was
Child-killing religion))
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Lance A. Brown [EMAIL
PROTECTED]wrotemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
If they are indeed _silent_, what
On 21 Aug 2008, at 18:53, Olin Elliott wrote:
The list has now been dominated by this discusion for much longer
than seems reasonable. It is much more distracting than William's
posts.
It does seem an enormous amount of fuss about one or two posts per
week. That's why I don't believe
At 09:33 AM Thursday 8/21/2008, Lance A. Brown wrote:
Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
If they are indeed _silent_, what makes you think they agree with you?
He's a mind reader. Doesn't believe in religion, but does believe in
telepathy. :-)
The Amazing William Maru
--[Lance]
I was being
http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gOpmWyOXR5j94s1rzxyBpDv886JQ
Toddler 'starved to death by cult'
Aug 12, 2008
A toddler whose remains were found inside a suitcase in Philadelphia
this spring was starved to death by members of a religious cult,
including his mother, in part because he
William,
This is not a discussion list about religion. I don't think we've ever
moderated anybody for frequent off-topic posting, but I'm growing
increasingly concerned that many of your postings are a distraction and
offensive to some who might otherwise participate. Others,including me, are
On 20 Aug 2008, at 15:12, Nick Arnett wrote:
William,
This is not a discussion list about religion
All is Brin.
. I don't think we've ever
moderated anybody for frequent off-topic posting, but I'm growing
increasingly concerned that many of your postings are a distraction
and
(was Child-killing religion)
William,
This is not a discussion list about religion. I don't think we've ever
moderated anybody for frequent off-topic posting, but I'm growing
increasingly concerned that many of your postings are a distraction and
offensive to some who might otherwise
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 8:10 AM, William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Don't read it then. I certainly don't read every post to this list.
Bzzzt. As you know, I am one of the list managers and as a group, we do and
we will read all the messages.
I'm growing increasingly concerned that
On 20 Aug 2008, at 16:22, Nick Arnett wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 8:10 AM, William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Don't read it then. I certainly don't read every post to this list.
Bzzzt. As you know, I am one of the list managers and as a group,
we do and
we will read all
On 20 Aug 2008, at 16:13, Olin Elliott wrote:
By that description, 99% of the postings are off topic.
And I'm not even the most frequent poster!
Agenda Maru
The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product
of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable,
On 20 Aug 2008, at 15:12, Nick Arnett wrote:
William,
This is not a discussion list about religion. I don't think we've
ever
moderated anybody for frequent off-topic posting, but I'm growing
increasingly concerned that many of your postings are a distraction
and
offensive to some who
43 matches
Mail list logo
