On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:05:18PM -0500, John D. Giorgis wrote:
That's why I made the bet in constant 2003 US dollars. The value of
that is fixed for all time. Barring the end of civilization as we
know it (in which case, neither of us is collecting) we will be able
to convert the fixed
On 2 Apr 2003 at 21:56, John D. Giorgis wrote:
At 12:54 AM 4/3/2003 +0100 Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 2 Apr 2003 at 17:40, Adam C. Lipscomb wrote:
Gautam wrote:
--- Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I give you less than 20 to crash and burn. In
spectacular fashion.
I'll
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Details of The Bet Re: Br!n: Re: Peter Arnett has negative effect
on ratings
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 21:56:40 -0500
At 12:54 AM 4/3/2003 +0100 Andrew
- Original Message -
From: Jon Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: Details of The Bet Re: Br!n: Re: Peter Arnett has negative
effect on ratings
For some reason, I'm reminded of the antiagathics vs. germanium as
currency
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:56:40PM -0500, John D. Giorgis wrote:
That's why I'm proposing measuring our bet in 2003 US $'s, and then
making whatever exchange adjustments we need to twenty years from now
to settle up. Basically, the US$ is a unit of measure - the bet can
be settled by any
JDG wrote:
That's why I'm proposing measuring our bet in 2003 US $'s, and then
making whatever exchange adjustments we need to twenty years from now to
settle up. Basically, the US$ is a unit of measure - the bet can be
settled by any other currency of equivalent value.
Erik responded:
Any
At 09:56 PM 4/2/2003 -0600 Reggie Bautista wrote:
JDG wrote:
That's why I'm proposing measuring our bet in 2003 US $'s, and then
making whatever exchange adjustments we need to twenty years from now to
settle up. Basically, the US$ is a unit of measure - the bet can be
settled by any other
