-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Deborah Harrell
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 5:08 PM
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Drug patents
Dan asked me a ways back about who held the most
patents on new drugs: here is why I do
Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Behalf Of Deborah Harrell
Dan asked me a ways back about who held the most
patents on new drugs: here is why I do not believe
that drug companies are the primary source of
innovation.
There is an article in the WSJ today about a
lawsuit
Deborah Harrell wrote:
So if gov't researchers _on their own time_ come up
with something novel, they should be 'owners' of that?
Depends.
If my husband comes up with *any* sort of software while he's with his
current employer, his current employer owns it. It's in his employment
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Deborah Harrell
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 2:59 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: RE: Drug patents
Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Behalf Of Deborah Harrell
Dan asked me a ways back
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Julia Thompson
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 5:00 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Drug patents
Deborah Harrell wrote:
So if gov't researchers _on their own time_ come up
with something
On 19 May 2006 at 18:40, Dan Minette wrote:
Deborah Harrell wrote:
So if gov't researchers _on their own time_ come up
with something novel, they should be 'owners' of that?
Depends.
If my husband comes up with *any* sort of software while he's with his
current employer,
Dan asked me a ways back about who held the most
patents on new drugs: here is why I do not believe
that drug companies are the primary source of
innovation.
There is an article in the WSJ today about a lawsuit
between Eli Lilly vs 2 former NIH researchers; I do
not have it on-line, and the site
