On 9 Jun 2008, at 10:24, Rceeberger wrote:
> Certainly, he actually believes it is a religion.
You claim it isn't a religion because it was created for fraudulent
reasons and/or its leadership doesn't believe it. I think it's pretty
obvious that Islam and LDS were both created by frauds (Muh
On 10/06/2008, at 8:34 AM, Rceeberger wrote:
>
> On 6/9/2008 6:54:35 AM, Charlie Bell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> On 09/06/2008, at 7:24 PM, Rceeberger wrote:
>>> Certainly, he actually believes it is a religion.
>>
>> In some ways, and to some people, it is.
>
> Some people think the Earth is
On 6/9/2008 5:55:35 PM, Ronn! Blankenship ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> At 05:34 PM Monday 6/9/2008, Rceeberger wrote:
>
> >On 6/9/2008 6:54:35 AM, Charlie Bell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On 09/06/2008, at 7:24 PM, Rceeberger wrote:
> > > > Certainly, he actually believes it is a religion.
>
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
> At 05:34 PM Monday 6/9/2008, Rceeberger wrote:
>
>> On 6/9/2008 6:54:35 AM, Charlie Bell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>> On 09/06/2008, at 7:24 PM, Rceeberger wrote:
Certainly, he actually believes it is a religion.
>>>
>>> In some ways, and to
At 05:34 PM Monday 6/9/2008, Rceeberger wrote:
>On 6/9/2008 6:54:35 AM, Charlie Bell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On 09/06/2008, at 7:24 PM, Rceeberger wrote:
> > > Certainly, he actually believes it is a religion.
> >
> > In some ways, and to some people, it is.
>
>Some people think the Earth i
On 6/9/2008 7:41:44 AM, William T Goodall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 9 Jun 2008, at 10:24, Rceeberger wrote:
>
> >
> > On 6/9/2008 1:38:44 AM, Charlie Bell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> I'm
> >> sure that if you asked what
> >> William's opinion is of
> Scientology
> >> itself, he'll say
>
On 6/9/2008 6:54:35 AM, Charlie Bell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 09/06/2008, at 7:24 PM, Rceeberger wrote:
> > Certainly, he actually believes it is a religion.
>
> In some ways, and to some people, it is.
Some people think the Earth is flat, but that does not make it so.
>
> It's still a pe
On 9 Jun 2008 at 13:41, William T Goodall wrote:
>
> On 9 Jun 2008, at 10:24, Rceeberger wrote:
>
> >
> > On 6/9/2008 1:38:44 AM, Charlie Bell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> I'm
> >> sure that if you asked what
> >> William's opinion is of Scientology
> >> itself, he'll say
> >> "it's just like
At 07:41 AM Monday 6/9/2008, William T Goodall wrote:
>Evil? Check.
>Mind-melting nonsense? Check.
>
>Sounds like religion to me.
Or maybe we're back to television . . .
. . . ronn! :)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 9 Jun 2008, at 10:24, Rceeberger wrote:
>
> On 6/9/2008 1:38:44 AM, Charlie Bell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> I'm
>> sure that if you asked what
>> William's opinion is of Scientology
>> itself, he'll say
>> "it's just like any other religion"...
>
> Certainly, he actually believes it is a re
On 09/06/2008, at 7:24 PM, Rceeberger wrote:
> Certainly, he actually believes it is a religion.
In some ways, and to some people, it is.
It's still a perverse, corrupt and dangerous organisation, however.
Charlie.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/
On 9 Jun 2008 at 11:58, Andrew Crystall wrote:
> On 9 Jun 2008 at 16:38, Charlie Bell wrote:
>
> >
> > On 09/06/2008, at 12:48 PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
> > >> It's his blog and he can set whatever rules he wants on it. I'm sure
> > >> your boycott will really bother him a lot :-)
> > >
> > > W
On 9 Jun 2008 at 16:38, Charlie Bell wrote:
>
> On 09/06/2008, at 12:48 PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
> >> It's his blog and he can set whatever rules he wants on it. I'm sure
> >> your boycott will really bother him a lot :-)
> >
> > William;
> >
> > Your not bothering to stand up and say you'll be
On 6/9/2008 1:38:44 AM, Charlie Bell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 09/06/2008, at 12:48 PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
> >> It's his blog and he can set whatever rules he wants on it. I'm sure
> >> your boycott will really bother him a lot :-)
> >
> > William;
> >
> > Your not bothering to stand up
On 09/06/2008, at 12:48 PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
>> It's his blog and he can set whatever rules he wants on it. I'm sure
>> your boycott will really bother him a lot :-)
>
> William;
>
> Your not bothering to stand up and say you'll be counted in this
> matter when it comes to the church of scie
On 9 Jun 2008 at 3:13, William T Goodall wrote:
>
> On 8 Jun 2008, at 17:35, Andrew Crystall wrote:
>
> > Of course, some people take it too far. Charles Stross, on his blog,
> > has recently been editing out any negative reference whatsoever to
> > Scientology, going far and away beyond what th
On 9 Jun 2008 at 3:13, William T Goodall wrote:
>
> On 8 Jun 2008, at 17:35, Andrew Crystall wrote:
>
> > Of course, some people take it too far. Charles Stross, on his blog,
> > has recently been editing out any negative reference whatsoever to
> > Scientology, going far and away beyond what th
On 8 Jun 2008, at 17:35, Andrew Crystall wrote:
> Of course, some people take it too far. Charles Stross, on his blog,
> has recently been editing out any negative reference whatsoever to
> Scientology, going far and away beyond what the law requires. That's
> censorship, and it serves simply to
On 8 Jun 2008 at 13:40, David Hobby wrote:
> Andrew Crystall wrote:
> ...
> > Of course, some people take it too far. Charles Stross, on his blog,
> > has recently been editing out any negative reference whatsoever to
> > Scientology, going far and away beyond what the law requires. That's
> >
Andrew Crystall wrote:
...
> Of course, some people take it too far. Charles Stross, on his blog,
> has recently been editing out any negative reference whatsoever to
> Scientology, going far and away beyond what the law requires. That's
> censorship, and it serves simply to encourage the abuse
UK libel law is a tricky thing. Unlike in many countries, if you host
a comment and have editing power over it, you can be held liable
alongside the author of a statement. Even linking to potentially
libellous comments can be hold to be distributing them, and is a
fresh offence of libel.
There
21 matches
Mail list logo
