> David Hobby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Kevin Tarr wrote:
> > > [I wrote]
> > >(Actually, I agree with whoever said that the
> wording
> > >was far too strong to answer a flat 'yes' to many
> > >questions, but a graded response would have
placed
> > >me on a somewhat more libertarian side. Bu
> From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> http://www.bcaplan.com/cgi/purity.cgi
> >>
> >
> >11.
> >
> >Kinda reassuring, actually.
>
> What is reassuring is that *someone* finally had a lower
> score than I did.
>
> 18
>
> JDG - Resident crazy conservative, right?
Hmmm... I
Kevin Tarr wrote:
...
> >(Actually, I agree with whoever said that the wording
> >was far too strong to answer a flat 'yes' to many
> >questions, but a graded response would have placed me
> >on a somewhat more libertarian side. But only
> >somewhat!)
> >
> >Debbi
>
> Every question seemed easy t
At 05:02 PM 3/18/2004, you wrote:
> "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Horn, John wrote:
> >> From: Kevin Tarr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> http://www.bcaplan.com/cgi/purity.cgi
> >11.
> >Kinda reassuring, actually.
> What is reassuring is that *someone* finally had a
> lower scor
> "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Horn, John wrote:
> >> From: Kevin Tarr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> http://www.bcaplan.com/cgi/purity.cgi
> >11.
> >Kinda reassuring, actually.
> What is reassuring is that *someone* finally had a
> lower score than I did.
>
> 18
> JDG - Re
27.
George A
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Kevin Tarr wrote:
> http://www.bcaplan.com/cgi/purity.cgi
> I had 40.
> Kevin T. - VRWC
> Failed again
41, even though a lot of the questions were pretty crappy.
__
Steve Sloan . Huntsville, Alabama => [EMAIL PRO
At 08:32 AM 3/16/2004 -0600 Horn, John wrote:
>> From: Kevin Tarr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> http://www.bcaplan.com/cgi/purity.cgi
>>
>
>11.
>
>Kinda reassuring, actually.
What is reassuring is that *someone* finally had a lower score than I did.
18
JDG - Resident crazy conservative, righ
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Horn, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Kevin Tarr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > http://www.bcaplan.com/cgi/purity.cgi
> >
46.
But if asked "why," I doubt I would have so high.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailma
Kevin Tarr wrote:
>
> http://www.bcaplan.com/cgi/purity.cgi
>
> I had 40.
>
> Kevin T. - VRWC
> Failed again
>
14. Many of the questions were just a bit too
strongly worded to get a 'yes' vote.
-- Matt
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo
> From: Kevin Tarr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> http://www.bcaplan.com/cgi/purity.cgi
>
11.
Kinda reassuring, actually.
- jmh
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 13 Mar 2004, at 3:17 am, Robert Seeberger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Tarr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 7:57 PM
Subject: Libertarian Purity Test
http://www.bcaplan.com/cgi/purity.cgi
I had 40.
32
55
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Tarr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 7:57 PM
Subject: Libertarian Purity Test
> http://www.bcaplan.com/cgi/purity.cgi
>
> I had 40.
&
http://www.bcaplan.com/cgi/purity.cgi
I had 40.
Kevin T. - VRWC
Failed again
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
14 matches
Mail list logo