- Original Message -
From: Michael Harney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average?(was RE: Federal
Marraige[sic]Amendment)
From: ritu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Seeberger wrote
Straight, married, kids, moderate. I think that last one makes me a freak around
here... ;-)
Jim
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
___
Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snippage
I didn't really think anyone was keeping a chart,
but... me, I'm poly, transgendered, sapiosexual,
with no children - fit THAT into your categories,
Debbi ^_^
blinks
opens mouth
closes mouth
shakes head
Umm, I think it's safe to say that
In a message dated 2/19/2004 12:55:02 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And just what is sapiosexual? wicked grin Only
has sex with wise persons? Only has sex with humans?
...with the self-aware?
Debbi
who seems quite boring in comparison
Only has sex with
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Gabriel
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 07:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal
Marraige [sic]Amendment)
Are we as a population representative
Julia Thompson wrote:
Miller, Jeffrey wrote:
I really AM curious about people's arrangments.. I don't talk much
about my life, but many people seem to be (happily) married with kids
(but then, I tend to think the whole world is like that ^_^)
Monogamous, hetero, married, kids.
Monogamous, bi,
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal
Marraige[sic]Amendment)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:59:25 -0800
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
In order to be average some need to be on either side of that average. I
tend to think that we average out, but only with a big standard
deviation over all the values, so that either side up to the outer
limits of the spectrum are represented. ;o)
Sonja :o)
xGCU: One man and one little man.
Ticia wrote:
Monogamous, bi, married, expecting first baby in June...
Sounds kinda difficult to be monogamous and bi - I guess one is who you
are and one is what you do.
I am surprised at the number of bi members - I had always thought it to
be purely the stuff of letters to Penthouse. It
- Original Message -
From: Russell Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal
Marraige[sic]Amendment)
Ticia wrote:
Monogamous, bi, married, expecting first
On 19 Feb 2004, at 12:08 am, Robert Seeberger wrote:
I suspect that pure heterosexuals may not even be a majority.
I'm in that 10% minority :) Can I get a disabled sticker for that?
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog :
Robert Seeberger wrote:
One thing you have to remember about Bisexuals.
They can blend into any crowd.
Remain hidden as long as they like.
And only attract notice if they want to be noticed.
My personal experience tells me that 40-60% of women I have dated were
Bi (to varying degrees) and
From: ritu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Seeberger wrote:
One thing you have to remember about Bisexuals.
They can blend into any crowd.
Remain hidden as long as they like.
And only attract notice if they want to be noticed.
My personal experience tells me that 40-60% of women I have
Jeffrey Miller asked:
Are we as a population representative in terms of sexuality
distribution? Does Brin-L have any openly GLBT members (excepting
myself, of course)?
*raises hand way back in the corner*
Right here. Bi.
Adam C. Lipscomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1) I believe that human sexuality is non-linear. While there are
certainly a great many people who are very firmly homosexual or
heterosexual, there just as surely exists some subset of people who
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 10:35 AM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal
Marraige [sic]Amendment)
Jeffrey Miller asked
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Harney
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 11:33 AM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal
Marraige [sic]Amendment)
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL
Top-post -- Of **course** we're not average! We're
clearly all _above average_! ;D
Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really AM curious about people's arrangments.. I
don't talk much about my life, but many people seem
to be (happily) married with kids (but then, I tend
to think
- Original Message -
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 3:23 PM
Subject: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige
[sic]Amendment)
Hetero here, (if you want me to put myself on a chart
--- Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hetero here, (if you want me to put myself on a
chart,
I'll guess ~ 95%, since I'm allowing that if I'd
grown
up in a radically different society I might not be
100%), single yet looking, 2 children-in-fur, 3
surrogate children-on-the-hoof...
Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hetero here, (if you want me to put myself on a
chart,
I'll guess ~ 95%, since I'm allowing that if I'd
grown
up in a radically different society I might not be
100%), single yet looking, 2 children-in-fur,
Miller, Jeffrey wrote:
I really AM curious about people's arrangments.. I don't talk much
about my life, but many people seem to be (happily) married with kids
(but then, I tend to think the whole world is like that ^_^)
Monogamous, hetero, married, kids.
Insane.
(I'm told it gets easier
Monogamous, hetero, married, kids.
Me too! Except changed married to engaged, and kids to
none...
Insane.
That too (but in a different way...bwahahahaha!)
Damon.
=
Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem,
In a message dated 2/17/2004 6:21:45 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Monogamous, hetero, married, kids.
monogamous hetero married kids (I have kids my kids aren't married at least
not the last time I looked)
___
From: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marraige [sic]
Amendment)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:25:23 -0800
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1
25 matches
Mail list logo