Re: IQtest.com, was Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE

2004-03-26 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 06:08 PM 3/25/04, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote: Ronn!Blankenship wrote: Much more interesting and useful information (much of it in graphic and tabular form, so it can't be reproduced here) can be found at <> and its subpages. That was actual

Re: IQtest.com, was Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE

2004-03-25 Thread Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
Ronn!Blankenship wrote: Much more interesting and useful information (much of it in graphic and tabular form, so it can't be reproduced here) can be found at <> and its subpages. That was actually rather interesting. Thanks for the info. Sonja GCU

Re: Re: IQtest.com, was Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE

2004-03-24 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 12:33 AM 3/24/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So I suppose the IQtest.com might be roughly equivalent to the Cattell > test (have the same SD in other words) (Every IQ test has a mean of > 100). Assuming you know how many ounces in a pound (aren't there different ounces and pounds for different

RE: IQtest.com, was Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE

2004-03-24 Thread ChadCooper
> Yowza - I got 160. > > Anyone else been tested at multiple points in their past? If > so, have you maintained your score? Yes.. Nothing personal but this test of way off of other tests I have seen in the past. It is inflated about 15-25 points in my estimation. Since it uses speed of thought

Re: IQtest.com, was Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE

2004-03-24 Thread William T Goodall
On 24 Mar 2004, at 6:33 am, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So I suppose the IQtest.com might be roughly equivalent to the Cattell test (have the same SD in other words) (Every IQ test has a mean of 100). Assuming you know how many ounces in a pound (aren't there different ounces and pounds for differ

Re: Re: IQtest.com, was Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE

2004-03-23 Thread rchapman
> So I suppose the IQtest.com might be roughly equivalent to the Cattell > test (have the same SD in other words) (Every IQ test has a mean of > 100). Assuming you know how many ounces in a pound (aren't there different ounces and pounds for different things?) and how much a nickel and a dime i

Re: IQtest.com, was Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE

2004-03-23 Thread William T Goodall
On 23 Mar 2004, at 2:23 pm, John Doe wrote: From: "Miller, Jeffrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: IQtest.com, was Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE

Re: IQtest.com, was Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE

2004-03-23 Thread David Hobby
John Doe wrote: ... > > > > You can do a free IQ test at www.iqtest.com in under 15 > > > minutes. Just as a test, I did it in ONE minute but marking random responses. The results are below: > Subject: > [SPAM] Your IQ Test Results ... > Thank you for taking the IQ Test at

RE: IQtest.com, was Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE

2004-03-23 Thread John Doe
From: "Miller, Jeffrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: IQtest.com, was Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:35:11 -0800 > >

Re: IQtest.com, was Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE

2004-03-23 Thread Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
Miller, Jeffrey wrote: Yowza - I got 160. Wellcome to brain-l it seems... ;o) Sonja GCU: Going to bake me a cake today ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

RE: IQtest.com, was Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE

2004-03-22 Thread Miller, Jeffrey
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sonja van > Baardwijk-Holten > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 02:44 AM > To: Killer Bs Discussion > Subject: IQtest.com, was Re: DEFENDERS OF THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE > > > William T Goodall wrote: >