At 11:39 1-2-2003 -0500, John Giorgis wrote:
Right now, the only political events being accomplished by terrorism
against the US in the past few years has been the wiping out of the
butchers of Baghdad and Kabul.
Do you know something the rest of the world (including the US government)
02, 2003 1:17 AM
Subject: RE: Shuttle down pessimism, reality, and not a joke
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
This is a new world. The _first_ thing I think of
whenever I hear about any sort of disaster is if this
is the next terrorist attack - because someday soon,
it will be.
Does
NASA is warning people not to go near any pieces if found.
There are enough people that believe in themselves more than civilization
that NASA should also warn eBay that any pieces put up for auction will be
confiscated, and the attempted sellers will be prosecuted.
William Taylor
: Saturday, February 01, 2003 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Shuttle down pessimism, reality, and not a joke
NASA is warning people not to go near any pieces if found.
There are enough people that believe in themselves more than
civilization
that NASA should also warn eBay
Gary L. Nunn wrote:
I am sad for obvious reasons, but my fear is that there are those in
congress and in the public that will use this disaster as
justification to attack the space program - especially if there are
ground injuries from the debris that fell into the town. CNN just
said the town
At 10:41 AM 2/1/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Gary L. Nunn wrote:
I am sad for obvious reasons, but my fear is that there are those in
congress and in the public that will use this disaster as
justification to attack the space program - especially if there are
ground injuries from the debris that fell
Kevin Tarr wrote:
At 10:41 AM 2/1/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I can't believe they feel it necessary to announce This is not a
terrorist attack. Does the media just want to sell us a bill of
fear, or have Americans gone so far off the paranoia deep end that
they need to be reassured of this at all
Kevin wrote...
Um, Yes?! That was the first message I heard about that plane
crash in NC.
Where was your outrage then? Okay, I am apologizing right now if that
remark, but still hitting send.
What the heck are you talking about Kevin?
___
--- Jim Sharkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't believe they feel it necessary to announce
This is not a terrorist attack. Does the media
just want to sell us a bill of fear, or have
Americans gone so far off the paranoia deep end that
they need to be reassured of this at all times?
Jim
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
This is a new world. The _first_ thing I think of
whenever I hear about any sort of disaster is if this
is the next terrorist attack - because someday soon,
it will be.
Does this mean, then, that terrorism works? If we're afraid every day that every
accident is
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 08:11:19AM -0800, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
It was the first thing I thought of (because of the Israeli astronaut,
and because it's such a natural target)
Me too. But within the next couple paragraphs of the article I read it
specified that contact was lost over Texas at
From: Jim Sharkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I can't believe they feel it necessary to announce This is
not a terrorist attack. Does the media just want to sell us
a bill of fear, or have Americans gone so far off the
paranoia deep end that they need to be reassured of this at all
At 10:59 AM 2/1/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Kevin Tarr wrote:
At 10:41 AM 2/1/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I can't believe they feel it necessary to announce This is not a
terrorist attack. Does the media just want to sell us a bill of
fear, or have Americans gone so far off the paranoia deep end that
At 10:41 AM 2/1/2003 -0500 Jim Sharkey wrote:
I can't believe they feel it necessary to announce This is not a
terrorist attack. Does the media just want to sell us a bill of fear, or
have Americans gone so far off the paranoia deep end that they need to be
reassured of this at all times?
Well,
--- Jim Sharkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this mean, then, that terrorism works? If
we're afraid every day that every accident is
terrorism, it certainly suggests to this layman that
despite our assertions to the contrary, terrorism is
a viable strategy for our enemies.
Jim
Only if
At 11:17 AM 2/1/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
This is a new world. The _first_ thing I think of
whenever I hear about any sort of disaster is if this
is the next terrorist attack - because someday soon,
it will be.
Does this mean, then, that terrorism works? If we're afraid
At 11:17 AM 2/1/2003 -0500 Jim Sharkey wrote:
Does this mean, then, that terrorism works?
In a word, Yes.
Indeed, living in Washington, DC, the thought that I could be wiped out by
an incident of nuclear or biological terrorism crosses my mind with
regularity.
If we're afraid every day
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Jim Sharkey
...
Does this mean, then, that terrorism works? If we're afraid
every day that every accident is terrorism, it certainly suggests
to this layman that despite our assertions to the
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
--- Jim Sharkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this mean, then, that terrorism works? If
we're afraid every day that every accident is
terrorism, it certainly suggests to this layman that
despite our assertions to the contrary, terrorism is
a viable strategy for our enemies.
In a message dated 2/1/2003 9:35:35 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RE: Shuttle down pessimism, reality, and not a joke
This title refered to ebay, and it would be nice to change it a bit now.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com
At 08:58 AM 2/1/2003 -0800 Nick Arnett wrote:
It only works if it succeeds in taking away our choices. As long as we
choose to continue to be free to choose how we live our lives, then
terrorism isn't working.
On balance, I'd say that 9/11, in particular, is working somewhat, since we
are
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Erik Reuter
...
Do we have any aerospace engineer lurkers here? What would happen if a
piece of the shuttle wing had a structural failure (dent, crack, piece
broken off, etc.) If the shuttle lost its
Jim Sharkey wrote:
I can't believe they feel it necessary to announce
This is not a terrorist attack. Does the media just
want to sell us a bill of fear, or have Americans gone
so far off the paranoia deep end that they need to be
reassured of this at all times?
Yes.
Is it likely that it
Jim Sharkey wrote:
I can't believe they feel it necessary to announce This is
not a terrorist attack. Does the media just want to sell
us a bill of fear, or have Americans gone so far off the
paranoia deep end that they need to be reassured of this at
all times?
The first massive shuttle
On 1 Feb 2003 at 11:14, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 08:11:19AM -0800, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
It was the first thing I thought of (because of the Israeli
astronaut, and because it's such a natural target)
Me too. But within the next couple paragraphs of the article I read
Have you flown recently?
George A
- Original Message -
From: Jim Sharkey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 1:17 AM
Subject: RE: Shuttle down pessimism, reality, and not a joke
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
This is a new world. The _first_ thing I think
26 matches
Mail list logo
