> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Reggie Bautista
...
> Nope, that process was called Bullet-cam by its inventors. The
> DVD of The
> Matrix has a very good explanation of this. Basically, several cameras
> surround the subject and
Sonja wrote:
Is that how those rather unusual shot's in some of the current pop videos
are made. I mean the ones where the whole picture is frozen and then the
camera pans around the artist? And those where the artist keeps moving
while the whole picture is frozen and the camera pans around him?
Erik Reuter wrote:
How can you take a film originally shot in 2D and show it in 3D? For 3D,
you need a parallax view of some sort, two cameras or a special camera.
I remember a 3D craze in the late '70s and early '80s. Friday the 13th Part
3 was originally in 3D, as was Jaws 3.
Are you sure th
Robert Seeberger wrote:
> Naw...this is a treasure:
>
> http://download.consumptionjunction.com/multimedia/cj_14401.wmv
>
> xponent
> High Bandwidth Of The Rings Maru
> rob
That was pretty funny, but I liked the Spiderman spoof from
that show a lot better. Jack Black shot webbing out of som
Jon Gabriel wrote:
>Okay, it wasn't that bad, but I did a Google search (after Jim
>called him a Hedgehog, I couldn't resist?) You're right. I
>shouldn't have asked. :-)
To be fair, that's his nickname in the porn industry. I can't take the credit for
that nom de guerre.
>The website I fo
Jon wrote:
> The website I found (and refuse to post a URL for) showed a guy in a
> loud shirt who looks like Horatio Sands wearing a big mustache.
He's
> clothed, but I know *I* have zero interest in seeing him nude. Why
in
> the heck would he be a porn star, and why on Earth would he be
> popular
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Sharkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 11:41 PM
Subject: Re: Stag Film Serenade
>
> Robert Seeberger wrote:
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Jon Gabrie
x27;t immediately obvious Maru
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Jim Sharkey
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 12:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stag Film Serenade
Robert Seeberger wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From:
Robert Seeberger wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Jon Gabriel"
>> Who is Ron Jeremy? (Or don't I wanna know?)
>> Jon
>
>If you dont know already, you dont wanna know.
Hey, don't be talking down "the hedgehog of porn," or you and I are gonna have to
fight. :)
Ron's a national trea
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Gabriel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 11:27 PM
Subject: RE: Stag Film Serenade
> Who is Ron Jeremy? (Or don't I wanna know?)
> Jon
>
If you dont know already, you dont
Robert Seeberger wrote:
> Good God!! Thats all I needTo see Ron Jeremy from all sides while in
> actionnaked.
>
> Excuse me...I think I'm going to go puke my guts up
>
> xponent
> Ugliest Man On Earth Maru
> rob
Speaking of puking, there's some very interesting puking i
Who is Ron Jeremy? (Or don't I wanna know?)
Jon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Robert Seeberger
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 12:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stag Film Serenade
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: Stag Film Serenade
> In a message dated 12/6/2002 5:11:12 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Is that how
Beefcake!
Jon
GSV It's really the only suitable reply!
VFP *groan*
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 12:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Matrix-style effects (Was: RE: Stag
In a message dated 12/6/2002 9:53:34 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Now an *Anime* movie or a CGI cartoon could simulate the technique very
> easily, as was done in "Shrek".
>
> Did the South Park movie have anything like that?
>
No, and if they did and it w
Jon Gabriel wrote:
> Now an *Anime* movie or a CGI cartoon could simulate the technique very
> easily, as was done in "Shrek".
Did you see the "outtake" where the princess's clothing didn't track the
princess's body exactly? *That* was funny. *That* was purely
unintentional, AFAIK. *That* was
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stag Film Serenade
In a message dated 12/6/2002 5:11:12 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In a message dated 12/6/2002 5:11:12 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Is that how those rather unusual shot's in some of the current pop videos
> are made. I mean the ones where the whole picture is frozen and then the
> camera pans around the artist?
That's a full cir
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:09:44AM +0100, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
wrote:
> Is that how those rather unusual shot's in some of the current pop
> videos are made. I mean the ones where the whole picture is frozen and
> then the camera pans around the artist? And those where the artist
> keeps mov
"Robert J. Chassell" wrote:
>How can you take a film originally shot in 2D and show it in 3D?
>
> AI programmers have written code that figures out 3D from the camera
> movement between 2D images taken for a 2D movie. Others have written
> code for a still camera with moving objects.
>
> As f
How can you take a film originally shot in 2D and show it in 3D?
AI programmers have written code that figures out 3D from the camera
movement between 2D images taken for a 2D movie. Others have written
code for a still camera with moving objects.
As far as I know, none of this is very good
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Erik Reuter wrote:
> How can you take a film originally shot in 2D and show it in 3D? For 3D,
> you need a parallax view of some sort, two cameras or a special camera.
>
> Marvin, you'll have to go and report back. You have your assignment...
Not that I'm averse to the assign
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 01:30:01PM +1000, Russell Chapman wrote:
> Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> >How can you take a film originally shot in 2D and show it in 3D? For 3D,
> >you need a parallax view of some sort, two cameras or a special camera.
> >
> I have a very vague recollection about some of these
Erik Reuter wrote:
How can you take a film originally shot in 2D and show it in 3D? For 3D,
you need a parallax view of some sort, two cameras or a special camera.
I have a very vague recollection about some of these being done in 3-D
using red-blue separation. At one point in the 70s it was c
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 05:05:27PM -0600, Marvin Long, Jr. wrote:
> requisite gritty wah-wah guitar licks 100% LIVE IN THE THEATER! And
> if that weren't enough, our very first feature of this series is
> also in 3-D! That's right, 3-D!, and the third- dimension has never
> been so amply filled
25 matches
Mail list logo
