At 06:55 PM 3/29/2004 -0500 Keith Henson wrote:
Bush is considered to be (and
might be) the worst president in US history.
By whom?Under the usual standards that Presidents rate such things, I
expect that he will be placed near or at the top of one-term Presidents if
he loses re-election.
JDG said:
By whom?Under the usual standards that Presidents rate such
things, I expect that he will be placed near or at the top of
one-term Presidents if he loses re-election.
Regardless of Bush Jr's merits, he surely doesn't compare favourably
with Bush Sr, who skillfully managed the
At 05:44 AM 3/30/2004 -0800 Richard Baker wrote:
JDG said:
By whom?Under the usual standards that Presidents rate such
things, I expect that he will be placed near or at the top of
one-term Presidents if he loses re-election.
Regardless of Bush Jr's merits, he surely doesn't compare
At 08:32 AM 30/03/04 -0500, you wrote:
At 06:55 PM 3/29/2004 -0500 Keith Henson wrote:
Bush is considered to be (and
might be) the worst president in US history.
By whom?
Google Results 1 - 10 of about 1,080 for worst president in US history
Bush. (0.22 seconds)
to be fair,
Google Results 1 -
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
led a spectacularly successful War in Afghanistan
spectacularly successful? It's not over yet by a longshot, much
too
soon to call it a success. At best, it is a work in progress.
Again, it depends on your criteria. As noted
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 06:30:42PM -, iaamoac wrote:
The elements that are still in progress, are elements that in the
judgement of history would merely be icing on the cake beyond the
goals which the war has already accomplished.
If Taliban and al-Qaeda are icing, that must be some awful
On Mar 30, 2004, at 9:04 AM, John D. Giorgis wrote:
At 05:44 AM 3/30/2004 -0800 Richard Baker wrote:
JDG said:
By whom?Under the usual standards that Presidents rate such
things, I expect that he will be placed near or at the top of
one-term Presidents if he loses re-election.
Regardless of
