At 09:27 AM 1/22/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
At 06:59 PM 1/20/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
John D. Giorgis wrote:
At 10:48 PM 1/18/2003 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
Julia
who doesn't like the end of a certain commercial
As opposed to
Doug Pensinger wrote:
Downright funny, IMO. I can't say that the large
mammalian protuberances (to quote FZ) or the shots
of scantily clad women has no effect on me (purely
involuntary 8^p), but I agree the commercial is
pretty juvenile. But what light beer commercial
isn't these
Horn, John wrote:
Could someone clue me in as to what commercial is being discussed here? I
seem to have missed that part...
Thanks. I think...
The lite beer commercial where the two attractive young women get into a cat
fight over whether or not it's less filling or tastes great.
(Tells
At 06:59 PM 1/20/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
John D. Giorgis wrote:
At 10:48 PM 1/18/2003 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
Julia
who doesn't like the end of a certain commercial
As opposed to the beginning of it?
The whole commercial leaves something to be desired, certainly (a
John D. Giorgis wrote:
At 06:59 PM 1/20/2003 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
The whole commercial leaves something to be desired, certainly (a sense
of decency?), but falling into the cement that way is *dangerous*, and
some idiot is going to end up hurting herself (or himself?) trying to
Julia Thompson wrote:
Now, I have heard that there is an ending only seen on cable TV that
might push the limits even farther, but I have not seen it.
As far as what the least objectionable thing in the commercial is, it's
the expressions of the girlfriends as the guys are relating the
At 08:23 PM 1/20/2003 -0600, you wrote:
John D. Giorgis wrote:
At 06:59 PM 1/20/2003 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
The whole commercial leaves something to be desired, certainly (a sense
of decency?), but falling into the cement that way is *dangerous*, and
some idiot is going to end up
