The truth seems to be between these two arguments.
I think that's valid. Rockets were a technology who's time had come. I
think the fact that delivering 1000 bombs could destroy a nation had
something to do with how quickly they were developed at first, but in a
world that had a jet starting
Although I normally like Stirling Newberry this deconstruction is not
one of his better blog posts.
The truth seems to be between these two arguments.
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Wayne Eddy darkenf...@gmail.com wrote:
The deconstruction seems more reasonable than the article to me.
On
Ronn! Blankenship
Space stasis: What the strange persistence of rockets can teach us
about innovation. - By Neal Stephenson - Slate Magazine -
http://www.slate.com/id/2283469/
I just read an article that completely deconstructed that article:
The deconstruction seems more reasonable than the article to me.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 7:44 AM, KZK evil.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
Ronn! Blankenship
Space stasis: What the strange persistence of rockets can teach us
about innovation. - By Neal Stephenson - Slate Magazine -
