Gary Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is more than just a little disturbing to
me. The abuses of Eminent Domain continue..
Homes may be 'taken' for private projects
Justices: Local governments can give OK if it's for
public good
Excerpts from the article...
WASHINGTON - The
At 01:53 PM Wednesday 6/29/2005, Deborah Harrell wrote:
Gary Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is more than just a little disturbing to
me. The abuses of Eminent Domain continue..
Homes may be 'taken' for private projects
Justices: Local governments can give OK if it's for
public
On 6/24/05, Jim Sharkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary Nunn wrote:
This is more than just a little disturbing to me. The abuses of
Eminent Domain continue..Homes may be 'taken' for private projects
Justices: Local governments can give OK if it's for public good
This is one of the most
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 6/23/2005 8:41:02 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any property may now be taken for the benefit of another private party,
but
the fallout from this decision will not be random, O'Connor wrote
Oh hell yes.
I don't
Gary Nunn wrote:
This is more than just a little disturbing to me. The abuses of
Eminent Domain continue..Homes may be 'taken' for private projects
Justices: Local governments can give OK if it's for public good
This is one of the most hideous decisions I've seen in a long time. Anyone who
This is more than just a little disturbing to me. The abuses of Eminent
Domain continue..
Homes may be 'taken' for private projects
Justices: Local governments can give OK if it's for public good
Excerpts from the article...
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that local
In a message dated 6/23/2005 8:41:02 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any property may now be taken for the benefit of another private party, but
the fallout from this decision will not be random, O'Connor wrote
Oh hell yes.
I don't think the law on civic
