Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> At 12:41 AM 10/5/03 +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote:
>> Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
>>
>>> At 12:03 AM 10/5/03 +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote:
>>
PS: Does my comment remind anyone that we seem to be missing some of the
picky arguments and linguistic contortions of the past on
At 12:41 AM 10/5/03 +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> At 12:03 AM 10/5/03 +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote:
>> PS: Does my comment remind anyone that we seem to be missing some of the
>> picky arguments and linguistic contortions of the past on the list?
> Um . . . I've been busy recent
Doug Pensinger wrote:
>
> Julia Thompson wrote:
>
> >actually got some sleep last night, we may have the nighttime feeding
> >situation under control for now!
> >__
> >
> So how are the babies doing after 1 week? What does their big brother
> think of them? H
Julia Thompson wrote:
actually got some sleep last night, we may have the nighttime feeding
situation under control for now!
__
So how are the babies doing after 1 week? What does their big brother
think of them? How are you holding up?
Doug
_
"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote:
>
> At 12:03 AM 10/5/03 +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote:
>
> >PS: Does my comment remind anyone that we seem to be missing some of the
> >picky arguments and linguistic contortions of the past on the list?
>
> Um . . . I've been busy recently. Perhaps the other pickers of nit
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> At 12:03 AM 10/5/03 +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote:
>> PS: Does my comment remind anyone that we seem to be missing some of the
>> picky arguments and linguistic contortions of the past on the list?
> Um . . . I've been busy recently. Perhaps the other pickers of nits have
Regards, Ray. (wannabe American millionaire)
PS: Does my comment remind anyone that we seem to be missing some of the
picky arguments and linguistic contortions of the past on the list?
Um . . . I've been busy recently. Perhaps the other pickers of nits have
also.
-- Ronn! :)
I didn't pic
At 12:03 AM 10/5/03 +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> At 11:36 PM 10/1/03 +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote:
>
>> The A$ is certaily not pegged to the US$. When I visited the States in
2001,
>> we got US$0.52 for our dollar, yet it is now "worth" US$68.
>
>
> The Australian dollar really
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> At 11:36 PM 10/1/03 +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote:
>
>> The A$ is certaily not pegged to the US$. When I visited the States in 2001,
>> we got US$0.52 for our dollar, yet it is now "worth" US$68.
>
>
> The Australian dollar really increased in value by 13,077% relative to t
At 11:36 PM 10/1/03 +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote:
The A$ is certaily not pegged to the US$. When I visited the States in 2001,
we got US$0.52 for our dollar, yet it is now "worth" US$68.
The Australian dollar really increased in value by 13,077% relative to the
US dollar in the past two years? Wow
In a message dated 10/1/2003 2:03:10 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book.
> > Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
> >
>
> At least give credit to Groucho when you're quoting him!
>
>
>
> Tom Beck
>
Wasn't
> Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book.
> Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
>
At least give credit to Groucho when you're quoting him!
Tom Beck
www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org
"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the
last.
>So? I haven't seen many barrel makers or stevedores lately either.
What do you mean? There is a Cooper on this list!
>Kevin Tarr
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
___
http://www.mccmedi
In a message dated 10/1/2003 6:52:22 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> It certainly is here in
> Australia. Living in a farming area, I get lonely here sometimes.
>
> Regards, Ray.
I'll sheepishly ignore the obvious reply here.
Outside of a dog, a man's best friend
Erik Reuter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:33:48PM +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote:
>> Australia has tied its economy to US,
>
> In what way? Is the Australian currency pegged to the US dollar? I've
> noticed that the Australian stock market is one of the least correlated
> with the US stock market
Kevin Tarr wrote:
At 11:21 AM 9/30/2003 -0700, you wrote:
There is another factor. Every nation contains some people who
remember that the nation bears responsibility for feeding itself.
There is a wish never to completely abandon the land. America is
down to the lowest fraction of farmers
At 11:21 AM 9/30/2003 -0700, you wrote:
There is another factor. Every nation contains some people who remember
that the nation bears responsibility for feeding itself. There is a wish
never to completely abandon the land. America is down to the lowest
fraction of farmers since we left the cav
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:33:48PM +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote:
> Australia has tied its economy to US,
In what way? Is the Australian currency pegged to the US dollar? I've
noticed that the Australian stock market is one of the least correlated
with the US stock market. Europe and the Far-East have
18 matches
Mail list logo
