So does Ms. Tucker think we should restore the original wording of the
Constitution by removing the right to privacy interpretation of the 14th
amendment on which the SCOTUS based its decision in _Roe v. Wade_? Or,
given that she is black, how about repealing the entire 14th amendment?
case_.
What it has to do with what she was talking about is that the
same leave
the Constitution alone argument she used in the article
could be used by
someone else for a different issue, such as the ones I used for
illustration. Her argument is not Leave the Constitution
alone
At 12:22 PM 8/10/03 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What it has to do with what she was talking about is that the same leave
the Constitution alone argument she used in the article could be used by
someone else for a different issue, such as the ones I used for
illustration. Her argument
Horn, John wrote:
From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone else see SCOTUS and reflexively substitute
another word as they read...?
SCOUTS?
Uh, nope.
I guess not.
If you mean slipping an extra letter in there and making a letter
substitution at the end of the
At 07:55 PM 8/9/03 -0500, The Fool wrote:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storycid=1317ncid=742e=11u=/0308
07/228/4x3bg.html
LEAVE THE CONSTITUTION ALONE
Thu Aug 7, 7:21 PM ET
By Cynthia Tucker
This was as unnecessary as it was utterly predictable: Shoring up his
appeal among
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 11:47:54AM -0500, Horn, John wrote:
Does anyone else see SCOTUS and reflexively substitute another word as
they read...?
SCOUTS?
--
Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storycid=1317ncid=742e=11u=/0308
07/228/4x3bg.html
LEAVE THE CONSTITUTION ALONE
Thu Aug 7, 7:21 PM ET
By Cynthia Tucker
This was as unnecessary as it was utterly predictable: Shoring up his
appeal among ultraconservative constituents, President Bush
the Constitution alone argument she used in the article could be used by
someone else for a different issue, such as the ones I used for
illustration. Her argument is not Leave the Constitution alone, period
as the headline of the article might suggest, but more like Leave the
Constitution
(J Which is why I also asked if she$B".(J would have said "Leave the
(BConstitution(B
(J alone" in 1866 when the Fourteenth Amendment was proposed to give rights to(B
(J former slaves . . .(B
(J (B
(B
(JYour attitude appears to be on the lines of, If you oppose any particular (B
