While these
http://science.nationalgeographic.com/science/space/universe/galaxies-article.htmlgalaxies
are small enough to fit within the central hub of our own Milky Way,
they each contain as many stars as larger, more mature galaxies.
On 02/05/2008, at 4:21 AM, Dan M wrote:
Why do you think mainstream science is wrong on global warming? Why
do you
think people will willingly die before using nuclear power?
Just out of interest - what about the environmental costs of getting
and refining uranium ore? It's not like the
Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro wrote:
Kevin B. O'Brien blasphemed:
Or does IAAMOAC mean that civilized behavior includes throwing
other people under the wheels in order to save themselves?
I don't recognize the acronym you used,
WHAT??? You herectic
The worst-case estimates I've seen put the carbon produced at arround
4% of coal, Charlie. And true, the deposits are not in the best
areas..but neither are the oil reserves, for different reasons. I'd
rather depend on Canada and Australia than the OPEC countries.
AndrewC
On 2 May 2008 at
I was talking in terms of restricting reproduction, not practicing
euthanasia. If we leave it to the Four Horsemen, I am certain the worst
of it will fall on those populations that are poor, and that will
hardly look any better. It will take more than just population
control, I suspect, but
Original Message:
-
From: Charlie Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 22:27:45 +1000
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: Brin-l Digest, Vol 377, Issue 3
On 02/05/2008, at 4:21 AM, Dan M wrote:
Why do you think mainstream science is wrong on global warming? Why
On 3 May 2008, at 02:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, I have a buddy working on a uraninium minining detector project
in the
US. The market for uranium has come out of the doldrums of the last
20+
years, so folks are actually looking now.
Last year, the US, for example, used about
On 03/05/2008, at 11:24 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize that the newly discovered, offline, Australian reserve is
in a
national park.
Yes, and in indigenous land. But it's not that that I mean. National
Parks aren't inherently more sensitive, they're just areas reserved
for
The moon. The frakkin' moon.
By what they said in dialogue at one point, I figured it was waning. Then
when we saw it on the screen, it was waxing.
Do they need to hire someone who understands the phases of the moon there?
Julia
___
Charlie Bell wrote on April 16th:
Re: An interesting response
On 17/04/2008, at 12:26 PM, Dan M wrote:
Well, Concord was a political animal from the very beginning wasn't
it? It was a tax subsidized showcase for Britain and France from the
start. IIRC, it never really was a profit center.
On 03/05/2008, at 1:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You seem to think the subsidies were aimed towards Concorde's final
fate.
They weren't, they were aimed at getting the time of long-haul
flights
down. Even today, it takes a day to get from London to Sydney.
Concorde was supposed to
11 matches
Mail list logo
