Re: Brin: Quantum Cryptography Outperformed By Thermodynamics

2012-06-15 Thread David Brin
Clever.  I will talk the DoD into implementing it with Google Tap!




From: KZK evil.ke...@gmail.com
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Thu, June 14, 2012 8:31:47 PM
Subject: Brin: Quantum Cryptography Outperformed By Thermodynamics

http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428202/quantum-cryptography-outperformed-by-classical/


The idea is straightforward. Alice wants to send Bob a message via an ordinary 
wire. At each end of the wire, there are two different resistors that 
correspond 
to a 0 or 1.

Alice encodes her message by connecting these two resistors to the wire in the 
required sequence.

Bob, on the other hand, connects his resistors to the wire at random.

The crucial part of this set up is that the actual current and voltage through 
the wire is random, ideally Johnson noise. The essential features of this noise 
are determined by the combination of resistors at each end. This noise is 
public--anybody can see or measure it.

Now here's the clever bit. Bob knows which resistor he connected to the wire 
and 
so can work out which resistor Alice must have connected.

But  Eve, who is listening in to the publicly available noise, does not know 
which resistor was connected at each end and cannot work it out either because 
the laws of thermodynamics prevent the extraction of this information from this 
kind of signal.



-
It’s cheap to maintain Lies and expensive to maintain Trvth.
--KZK's Maxim


___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Brin events

2012-06-15 Thread David Brin
Oh by the way, many of you probably received my annual newsletter during the 
last couple of days. So you know about my book tour schedule, with in-person 
events in Seattle, Portland, the Bay Area, LA and San Diego area.

Also see http://www.davidbrin.com for info about a Tweet extravaganza on 6/20 ( 
1pm) #TorChat... and a Reddit Ask Me Anything marathon on 6/26!

I assume you all have seen my new web site http://www.davidbrin.com

...and the fantastic preview trailer that Patrick Farley painted and executed 
for me! tinyurl.com/exist-trailer

Sorry for the salesmanship, but I'm working hard!  And it has been 8 years 
since 
a big brin book so I hope you don't mind!

Best to all.
davidb___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Br¡n: Quantum Cryptography Outperformed By Thermodynamics

2012-06-15 Thread Ronn! Blankenship

At 11:31 PM Thursday 6/14/2012, KZK wrote:

http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428202/quantum-cryptography-outperformed-by-classical/

The idea is straightforward. Alice wants to send Bob a message via 
an ordinary wire. At each end of the wire, there are two different 
resistors that correspond to a 0 or 1.


Alice encodes her message by connecting these two resistors to the 
wire in the required sequence.


Bob, on the other hand, connects his resistors to the wire at random.

The crucial part of this set up is that the actual current and 
voltage through the wire is random, ideally Johnson noise. The 
essential features of this noise are determined by the combination 
of resistors at each end. This noise is public--anybody can see or measure it.


Now here's the clever bit. Bob knows which resistor he connected to 
the wire and so can work out which resistor Alice must have connected.




So while this is going on, what are Carol and Ted up to?





___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Brin: Quantum Cryptography Outperformed By Thermodynamics

2012-06-15 Thread David Hobby

On 6/15/2012 2:37 AM, KZK wrote:

 But Eve, who is listening in to the publicly
available noise, does not know which resistor was connected at each
end and cannot work it out either because the laws of thermodynamics
prevent the extraction of this information from this kind of signal.


So why isn't this susceptible to a simple man in the middle attack?:

Eve cuts the wire between Alice and Bob (AB line) and insert her own 
node that connects to Alice (AE line) and Bob (BE Line) individually. 
Alice can't tell the difference between the AB line or the AE Line and 
sets her resisters.  Eve sets her resisters connected on the AE line 
to random and deciphers the sequence that Alice used.  Eve then Uses 
that sequence on the BE Line.  Bob can't tell the difference between 
the AB line and the BE line, sets his resisters randomly and decodes 
the message.  (Eve can even send Bob a False message).


Seems like this method requires a 100% secure land line, which is 
impractical.


KZK--

I believe that Alice and Bob are doing the resistor thing for each bit 
simultaneously,
and sharing their measurements over a separate open channel.  (The paper 
says the
voltage/current data on the noisy channel is public.)  Furthermore, 
they're tossing
all the trials where those data show they both picked the high 
resistors or both
picked the low.  So all Eve can usefully look at are data for 
essentially identical
trials, each one with the noise characteristic of one high and one low 
resistor on the
channel.  Eve is free to relay noise between the two lines in your 
example, but that

won't help her.

If the land line is tapped in a useful manner, the claim is that Alice 
and Bob can
detect that it is.  So they'd need a land line, but wouldn't have to 
secure it.


---David


___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Brin: Quantum Cryptography Outperformed By Thermodynamics

2012-06-15 Thread KZK

On 6/15/2012 2:37 AM, KZK wrote:

 But Eve, who is listening in to the publicly available noise, does
 not know which resistor was connected at each end and cannot work it
 out either because the laws of thermodynamics prevent the extraction
 of this information from this kind of signal.


So why isn't this susceptible to a simple man in the middle attack?:


Eve cuts the wire between Alice and Bob (AB line) and insert her own
node that connects to Alice (AE line) and Bob (BE Line) individually.
Alice can't tell the difference between the AB line or the AE Line
and sets her resisters. Eve sets her resisters connected on the AE
line to random and deciphers the sequence that Alice used. Eve then
Uses that sequence on the BE Line. Bob can't tell the difference
between the AB line and the BE line, sets his resisters randomly and
decodes the message. (Eve can even send Bob a False message).


Seems like this method requires a 100% secure land line, which is
impractical.



David Hobby Fri, 15 Jun 2012 06:31:29 -0700:

I believe that Alice and Bob are doing the resistor thing for each
bit simultaneously, and sharing their measurements over a separate
open channel.


And so Eve man-in-the-middles the second connection too.  So all of 
Alice and Bob's communications are with eve, so that (Eve and Alice) And 
(Eve and Bob) are doing the resistor thing for each bit simultaneously 
(but not Alice and Bob, they have no connection with each other), and 
(Eve and Alice) And (Eve and Bob) are sharing their measurements over 
the separate lines (but not Alice and Bob, they have no connection with 
each other).  Bob still can't tell the difference between Eve and Alice 
and Alice can't tell the difference between Eve and Bob.



(The paper says the voltage/current data on the noisy
channel is public.) Furthermore, they're tossing all the trials
where those data show they both picked the high resistors or both
picked the low. So all Eve can usefully look at are data for
essentially identical trials, each one with the noise characteristic
of one high and one low resistor on the channel. Eve is free to relay
noise between the two lines in your example, but that won't help
her.


Doesn't matter, so long as Eve is between all communications channels.

___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Brin: Quantum Cryptography Outperformed By Thermodynamics

2012-06-15 Thread David Hobby

On 6/15/2012 2:14 PM, KZK wrote:


Eve cuts the wire between Alice and Bob (AB line) and insert her own
node that connects to Alice (AE line) and Bob (BE Line) individually.
Alice can't tell the difference between the AB line or the AE Line
and sets her resisters. Eve sets her resisters connected on the AE
line to random and deciphers the sequence that Alice used. Eve then
Uses that sequence on the BE Line. Bob can't tell the difference
between the AB line and the BE line, sets his resisters randomly and
decodes the message. (Eve can even send Bob a False message).



David Hobby Fri, 15 Jun 2012 06:31:29 -0700:

I believe that Alice and Bob are doing the resistor thing for each
bit simultaneously, and sharing their measurements over a separate
open channel.


And so Eve man-in-the-middles the second connection too.  So all of 
Alice and Bob's communications are with eve, so that (Eve and Alice) 
And (Eve and Bob) are doing the resistor thing for each bit 
simultaneously (but not Alice and Bob, they have no connection with 
each other), and (Eve and Alice) And (Eve and Bob) are sharing their 
measurements over the separate lines (but not Alice and Bob, they have 
no connection with each other).  Bob still can't tell the difference 
between Eve and Alice and Alice can't tell the difference between Eve 
and Bob.

...
Doesn't matter, so long as Eve is between all communications channels.


Between ALL communications channels, even the public ones?  That's asking
rather a lot of Eve.  I think there are a lot of people who would use a 
cryptographic
system that required an additional open channel, confident that they 
could somehow
route around Eve most of the time.  (Alice and Bob could be just posting 
their
versions of the public information on their respective websites, and 
checking that

they agreed.)

But yes, it's a minor flaw that was not mentioned in the press release.

---David

___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Brin events

2012-06-15 Thread Dave Land
On Jun 14, 2012, at 11:21 PM, David Brin wrote:

 Sorry for the salesmanship, but I'm working hard!  And it has been 8 years 
 since a big brin book so I hope you don't mind!

I think you can be forgiven, particularly if there's any chance that your Bay 
Area friends can buy you a drink while you're here. If you have any time in the 
evening, I'd like to see you, and one or two others maybe, too?

Dave


___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Brin: Quantum Cryptography Outperformed By Thermodynamics

2012-06-15 Thread KZK

 David Hobby Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:35:51 -0700:


Between ALL communications channels, even the public ones?  That's
asking rather a lot of Eve. I think there are a lot of people who
would use a cryptographic system that required an additional open
channel, confident that they could somehow route around Eve most of
the time. (Alice and Bob could be just posting their versions of the
public information on their respective websites, and checking that
they agreed.)


So Eve Man-in-the-middles Bob's connection to his webserver.  Bob thinks 
he's writing information to correlate with Alice.  What actually happens 
is Eve replaces the data Bob uses with the data from the Eve-Alice 
connection.  When Bob is connected to the website he see's the 
information he thinks he's posted (Because Eve knows to change it back 
for him, and only him, (also Alice's website data must be changed for 
Bob and only Bob)).  Etc.


Complicated? Yes, But plausible (this is sort of how the Sony Rootkit 
worked).



But yes, it's a minor flaw that was not mentioned in the press
release.


Seems like it might be impractical.  CITOKATE.

___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Brin events

2012-06-15 Thread KZK

Dave Land
Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:04:21 -0700

I think you can be forgiven, particularly if there's any chance that your Bay
Area friends can buy you a drink while you're here. If you have any time in the
evening, I'd like to see you, and one or two others maybe, too?


FYI: Pretty sure you need the colon in Brin: for messages to be sent 
to DB.



___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Brin events

2012-06-15 Thread Nick Arnett
Sure wish I could participate, but I'm headed to the Big Boulder
conference, in Boulder, Colorado, that weekend... disappointed!

Nick

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Dave Land dml...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Jun 14, 2012, at 11:21 PM, David Brin wrote:

 Sorry for the salesmanship, but I'm working hard!  And it has been 8 years
 since a big brin book so I hope you don't mind!


 I think you can be forgiven, particularly if there's any chance that your
 Bay Area friends can buy you a drink while you're here. If you have any
 time in the evening, I'd like to see you, and one or two others maybe, too?

 Dave



 ___
 http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Quantum Cryptography Outperformed By Thermodynamics

2012-06-15 Thread Jon Louis Mann
I don't have a clue what you're talking about, Dr. Brin, but it's good to know 
you're still findding the time to keep up with brin-l.  It's your fault that I 
got sucked into joining Facebook.  Your wall is far too interesting and turning 
into a time suck!~)

___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Brin events

2012-06-15 Thread Medievalbk
At every stop, there should be a What's next? question.
 
 
In a message dated 6/14/2012 11:21:34 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,  
db...@sbcglobal.net writes:

Ask Me  Anything marathon 
___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com