From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 11/14/2003 4:43:48 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
He's quite clear in the intro that it's a work of fiction. A 'wink wink
nod
nod' scenario would have been a single line which said 'Of course, I
don't
support this.' Instead,
Dan Minette wrote:
No, as I've never stated you were evil. Did JDG ever call you evil?
Dan M.
No, but JDG does not post 20 times a day that you are evil.
How many times has he called you, personally, evil, as opposed to calling
religion evil?
Now I'm not excusing his excesses at all, but
Jon Gabriel wrote:
There is a _huge_ difference in this instance between what you describe
and what's on that site. I respectfully suggest you consider re-reading
it, because I'm rather surprised you would make this comparison.
OK, I read it a third time.
You don't see the difference
Julia asked:
Hm. Wondering now:
how many religious people on list
how many very non-religious people on list
how many people have killfiles
if killfiles by religious people have primarily non-religious people
if killfiles by non-religious people have primarily religious people
I have
How many veterans on the list?
I'll start the count at 1.
George A
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Jon Gabriel wrote:
Out of curiosity, do you object to Tom Clancy novels?
Oh, I do. The first book of his I read, one of his characters implied,
somewhere in the first 50 pages, that Indira Gandhi was assassinated
because India is such an awful place that her own security guards had no
choice
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:29:10PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Erik Reuter wrote:
Have you ever met anyone who makes hot chocolate without SOME form
of milk? Whole, 2%, skim, dry milk, something besides water? Darn
ivory tower research! :-)
I tried it once,
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wondering if you have read Al Frankin's new
book. As you know he pretty much takes apart Hannity
and O'Reilly. You should know that Colmes was hired
by Hannity to be his liberal foil. Colmes is more
centrist than anything else and for the most part he
is
--- Kevin Tarr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we are being curious, how about a fantasy of
government agents laying
siege to a religious cult, in the end killing 80
adults and children?
If you want a single person, how about a fantasy of
a sniper who's a good
enough shot to kill a
--- Bryon Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This brings to mind a pet peeve of mine that drove
me crazy, but I've never
seen anyone else comment on it... Back during the
Clinton era, from day 1 of
his presidency, Clinton was constantly being called
a pothead for his
admitted didn't inhale
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/14/technology/14super.html
SAN FRANCISCO, Nov. 13 - I.B.M. plans to introduce a dishwasher-size
prototype supercomputer on Friday that the company says will also have
broad uses in high-capacity corporate data centers in the future.
The machine, Blue Gene/L, will
--- ritu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, I do. The first book of his I read, one of his
characters implied,
somewhere in the first 50 pages, that Indira Gandhi
was assassinated
because India is such an awful place that her own
security guards had no
choice but to kill her. The officer wound up
Blackmail latest scam for hackers
LONDON , England (Reuters) --The rapid growth of broadband home computer
connections may be inadvertently fueling what police suspect could be the
start of a new crime wave -- cyber-blackmail.
As more homes connect to faster delivery systems, their computers
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 04:30:59AM -0800, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
Most surveys say that upwards of _90%_ of reporters vote Democratic.
What does that say?
Inquisitive, well-informed people vote Democratic? :-)
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
Ritu wrote:
Out of curiosity, do you object to Tom Clancy novels?
Oh, I do. The first book of his I read, one of his characters implied,
But if that was the opinion of a _character_, it does not
necessarily mean that it was the opinion of the _author_.
somewhere in the first 50 pages,
Andrew Crystall wrote:
So you are also fanatically anti-religious, for some specific
religions.
I am surrounded by fanatics!!!
Anti-religion? No.
Anti-scientolgist? YES.
Scientology is a *dangerous* UFO Cult
Dangerous? In which way?
Alberto Monteiro - who would like to have all
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 04:41:04AM -0800, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
A government sting that ends in the murder by Federal agents of an
American citizen holding her baby done at the behest of a liberal
Democrat is a worthy exercise of government power protecting
Americans. Holding non-citizens
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 04:45:59AM -0800, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
Just to be clear - he has never made any such admission. He refused
to answer the question as to whether he has or has not.
This would appear similar to your position on if you don't condemn it,
then you tacitly endorse it. Why
At 04:10 AM 11/15/03 +, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 15 Nov 2003 at 1:22, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Andrew Crystall wrote:
Not you. I don't think either of the people I killfiled are that
regular posters anymore. (no-one else is quoting them anyway)
I have a few on the culture list,
On 15 Nov 2003, at 1:26 pm, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 04:10 AM 11/15/03 +, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 15 Nov 2003 at 1:22, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Andrew Crystall wrote:
Not you. I don't think either of the people I killfiled are that
regular posters anymore. (no-one else is quoting
--- Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wake up on the wrong side of bed, Gautam? Is it so
difficult to admit
that they are BOTH wrong? I haven't seen anyone here
trying to excuse
the former. The latter, however...
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
Well, I don't actually
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 07:26:21AM -0600, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
I didn't realize UFOs were involved. But, then, I've not made a
detailed study of it.
No one has. THAT's why their unidentified!
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:38:23AM -0800, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
Well, most CEOs vote Republican, which suggests that competent,
capable people vote Republican. :-)
Dishonest, greedy, take advantage of shareholders people, you mean? :-)
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:37:36AM -0800, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
Well, I don't actually think that holding people who were fighting
against the United States prisoner _is_ wrong.
Exactly my point. How you can justify holding anyone without a fair
trial and access to a lawyer is incredible.
At 08:17 AM 11/15/03 -0500, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 04:45:59AM -0800, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
Just to be clear - he has never made any such admission. He refused
to answer the question as to whether he has or has not.
This would appear similar to your position on if you don't
At 04:36 PM 11/15/03 +0900, G. D. Akin wrote:
How many veterans on the list?
I'll start the count at 1.
2.
-- Ronn! :)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
--- Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:37:36AM -0800, Gautam
Mukunda wrote:
Well, I don't actually think that holding people
who were fighting
against the United States prisoner _is_ wrong.
Exactly my point. How you can justify holding anyone
without a
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 07:50:43AM -0600, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
Would that be anything like making a statement to the effect that If
you don't condemn getting blow jobs in the office from underlings, you
tacitly endorse it, despite the fact that for the average person it
can adversely
At 08:55 AM 11/15/03 -0500, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 07:50:43AM -0600, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
Would that be anything like making a statement to the effect that If
you don't condemn getting blow jobs in the office from underlings, you
tacitly endorse it, despite the fact that
In a message dated 11/14/2003 9:54:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
All right, OK, very well then! -- puts on attentive
face with glasses and sits with chin on fist
Play ball!
Ata girl
___
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 08:03:07AM -0600, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
Oh, good.
blow job = good
blow up nose = bad
Thank you for clearing that up for me.
You're welcome. You may now return to your regularly scheduled blow job.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:54:38AM -0800, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
Because we are _at war_. We didn't give German POWs
Yeah, right, Gautam. I won't even bother to argue the at war point,
which is laughable, but that you would argue that human rights should be
ignored during war is just sad.
Yet
At 09:30 PM 11/14/2003 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So enough of this crap. Quit ganging up on the Fool (my god more of the
nasty conspiracy - now I am defending the fool)
If people criticized The Fool for positing an article Jewish dreams of
world domination, would you feel the same way?
JDG
At 02:19 PM 11/14/2003 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote:
how many religious people on list
Very free from my estimation.
how many very non-religious people on list
Certainly more than the former.
how many people have killfiles
Well, I would be interested in the results of Jon's proposed poll.
if
--- Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know what a nice trial is, but the
prisoners should receive
the same right to a fair a speedy trial that all
people are entitled to.
Innocent until proven guilty, you may have forgotten
in your war on all
non-Americans zeal.
Erik Reuter
At 11:25 PM 11/14/2003 -0800 Doug Pensinger wrote:
No, as I've never stated you were evil. Did JDG ever call you evil?
Dan M.
No, but JDG does not post 20 times a day that you are evil.
How many times has he called you, personally, evil, as opposed to calling
religion evil?
Now I'm not
Change of address:
As most of you already know, Trent Shipley has transferred the Alliance for
Progress Encyclopedia to me. The initial upload suffered from major problems
with dead links, which was caused by the fact that filenames were in lower
case (ie. filename.htm) while the URLs had both
Gautam wrote:
Well, most CEOs vote Republican, which suggests that
competent, capable people vote Republican. :-)
Or that overpaid, pampered leeches vote Republican.
Adam C. Lipscomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://aclipscomb.blogspot.com
___
Ronn wrote:
blow job = good
blow up nose = bad
Exactly. I am fully, 100% in support of blow jobs. I am unequivocably
opposed to cocaine.
Adam C. Lipscomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://aclipscomb.blogspot.com
___
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:29:10PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Erik Reuter wrote:
Have you ever met anyone who makes hot chocolate without SOME form
of milk? Whole, 2%, skim, dry milk, something besides water? Darn
O.k., I suppose that I have a moral obligation to step in to this
discussion, particularly following Dan's observation.
As perhaps the author of the most famous killfile in list history (in re: a
former listmember) I certainly am not going to bash anyone for setting up a
killfile. I think there
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 7:26 AM
Subject: Re: Explanation
At 04:10 AM 11/15/03 +, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 15 Nov 2003 at 1:22, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Andrew
- Original Message -
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 7:40 AM
Subject: Re: Explanation
I presume you mean by 'Cult' a 'false religion'. But isn't a false
religion a religion too? Or if not, how do
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Alberto Monteiro - who would like to have all horoscopes
in the newspapers have their authors subject to being sued
when their predictions didn't come true :-)
But the ones I see are vague enough that there's be plenty of room for the
defense to
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 08:03:07AM -0600, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
Oh, good.
blow job = good
blow up nose = bad
Thank you for clearing that up for me.
You're welcome. You may now return to your regularly scheduled blow job.
How many
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, John D. Giorgis wrote:
Then again, maybe none of us are perfect.
Maybe?
I believe that nobody on this list is perfect.
I believe that a lot of people on this list are trying, anyway. And some
are trying in the other sense of the word. :) And maybe some people are
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Doug Pensinger wrote:
Just out of curiosity, if someone posted a fantasy about molesting a
child, saying that the darker parts of his mind imagined it but
explaining carefully that he would never advocate such a thing and why,
would that be just OK?
Posting it here
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 07:39:32 -0600, Ronn!Blankenship
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 04:36 PM 11/15/03 +0900, G. D. Akin wrote:
How many veterans on the list?
I'll start the count at 1.
2.
3
--
Doug
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
At 09:22 AM 11/15/2003 -0600 Dan Minette wrote:
I heard that Hubberd made up Scientology as a scam to make lots of money,
and didn't really believe at all. Does anyone know how accurate/inaccurate
this is?
He never said the above publicly, but years before founding Scientology he
made a comment
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 06:22:13AM -0800, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
If you don't think we're at war, there's a big hole in New York that
would argue otherwise.
By your definition, which is apparently not the Congress has declared
war, but as far as I can tell appears to be that there are some
Julia wrote...
Although I've heard of a case where someone got arrested
because he wrote
something in his private journal (on paper) along those lines. Don't
remember how they got hold of his private journal to be reading that.
I remember the case you are talking about. I think this was
Just like that, a 6-8 week drops me back to .500 at 72-72. Maybe I should
just start flipping coins.
Arizona at Cleveland - Yes the Browns are in a bit of disarray after
unexpectedly cutting their best WR this week, but a second straight road
trip to the East for the Cardinals has to take
At 01:31 PM 11/14/2003 -0800 Deborah Harrell wrote:
--- The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.pandagon.net/archives/1992.htm
Murder, Murder
WASHINGTON-January 6, 2004. A paramilitary
organization calling itself
the Christian Liberation Front changed the balance
of power in
In a message dated 11/15/2003 8:44:17 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:05:54AM -0800, Matt Lundstrom wrote:
As of now the Alliance for Progress Encyclopedia is available at
http://www.geocities.com/allianceforprogress (update your
JDG wrote:
If people criticized The Fool for positing an article Jewish
dreams of world domination, would you feel the same way?
Why Jewish? Those who are taking steps in World Domination
are the Swiss People! They control the money, not the Jews.
Alberto Monteiro
Dan Minette wrote:
I heard that Hubberd made up Scientology as a scam to make
lots of money, and didn't really believe at all. Does anyone
know how accurate/inaccurate this is?
I remember reading somewhere that Hubbard made a bet with another
SF writer about it. He bet that he could create a
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 01:31 PM 11/14/2003 -0800 Deborah Harrell wrote:
--- The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.pandagon.net/archives/1992.htm
Murder, Murder
WASHINGTON-January 6, 2004. A paramilitary
organization calling itself
the Christian
--- Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we are neither legally nor morally obligated to do
and
Of course we are morally obligated to extend human
rights to humans.
That you consistently deny this is very sad.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
See Erik, a key difference
--- Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember Ruby Ridge and the controversy
surrounding it. There was a lot
of debate concerning exactly what happened. The
range of interpretations
that I saw was anything from a mistake under fire to
actions that should
have ended up with the trial
On 15 Nov 2003, at 5:02 pm, Steve Sloan II wrote:
Dan Minette wrote:
I heard that Hubberd made up Scientology as a scam to make
lots of money, and didn't really believe at all. Does anyone
know how accurate/inaccurate this is?
I remember reading somewhere that Hubbard made a bet with another
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 09:21:34AM -0800, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
See Erik, a key difference between you and me is I tend to say things
like reasonable people can differ on this issue and you don't.
Actucally, the difference is that I don't think it is reasonable to hold
an attitude that people
On 15 Nov 2003, at 3:24 pm, Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 7:40 AM
Subject: Re: Explanation
I presume you mean by 'Cult' a 'false religion'. But isn't a false
- Original Message -
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: Explanation
On 15 Nov 2003, at 3:24 pm, Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: William T Goodall
From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 04:36 PM 11/15/03 +0900, G. D. Akin wrote:
How many veterans on the list?
I'll start the count at 1.
2.
3
Not me. (Though my wife, father, step-father, 2 brothers-in-law, and many
of our friends and family are). I'm just
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: christian dreams of murder...
I actually don't blame the agent involved much at all.
I blame the orders he was given. I
--- Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you saying that the report of the official
investigation was false, or
are you just interpreting it in a far different
manner than I do?
http://www.byington.org/Carl/ruby/ruby1.htm
As far as I can tell, the orders were consistent
with SOP for
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: christian dreams of murder...
, and maybe the names and faces of CIA
informants published?
The Bush administration is doing a
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby Ridge..
--- Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you saying that the report of the official
investigation was
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: christian dreams of murder...
So, Erik, be a reasonable person. How would you deal
with the problem? I have a solution -
--- Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] The
Bush administration is doing a pretty good job
of this on their own.
xponent
In The News Maru
rob
A claim for which you have _no_, as in zero, evidence.
A lot of people have _claimed_ that the
Administration leaked that name - all of them
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: christian dreams of murder...
--- Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] The
Bush administration is doing a pretty good job
of
--- Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes and no. I've seen Rumsfeld state that no trials
are neededthey can
be held indefinately without trial until the war on
terror ends. The
problems with this, compared to a war like WWII, are
obvious I think. The
war on terror will not end
--- Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm missing something. Didn't Robert Novak claim
that he got his info from
a high administration official?
Dan M.
It has become rather vague since then. We _don't
know_ if it was a political appointee, a career civil
servant (someone in the SES
Steve Sloan II wrote:
I heard that Hubberd made up Scientology as a scam to make
lots of money, and didn't really believe at all. Does anyone
know how accurate/inaccurate this is?
I remember reading somewhere that Hubbard made a bet with another
SF writer about it. He bet that he could
Julia Thompson wrote:
Alberto Monteiro - who would like to have all horoscopes
in the newspapers have their authors subject to being sued
when their predictions didn't come true :-)
But the ones I see are vague enough that there's be plenty of room for the
defense to be reasonably
On 15 Nov 2003, at 9:34 pm, Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: Explanation
On 15 Nov 2003, at 3:24 pm, Dan Minette wrote:
- Original
At 04:33 PM 11/15/2003 -0800 Gautam Mukunda wrote:
I would also point out that half of Washington has known
Valerie Plame was a CIA agent for years, so it's not
as if it's a major security breach either. None of
this, of course, came out in the press.
Indeed, I am sure that the intelligence
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 04:43:34PM -0800, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
Their hysteria is fundamentally a product of immaturity - they are
like five years olds who want a diamond ring. Adults have to make
choices and understand the consequences on both sides of actions. I
_don't know_ for sure what
John D. Giorgis wrote:
Secondly, I have begun a post once Look, punk IIRC, I meant that
phrase to be a bit more humorous, in an albeit dark way, than it ended
up sounding
I'm not going to tell you what you were thinking when you posted, but as I
recall you later described the depth of
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, John D. Giorgis wrote:
NY Jets at Indianapolis - This is the injury bowl. The Jets are banged
up on defense, and without Wayne Chrebet. The Colts have many holes on
their offensive line, and are without Marvin Harrison and Marcus
Pollard. Ouch.
Still, Peyton
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Julia Thompson wrote:
Alberto Monteiro - who would like to have all horoscopes
in the newspapers have their authors subject to being sued
when their predictions didn't come true :-)
But the ones I see are vague enough that there's be
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, John D. Giorgis wrote:
At 04:33 PM 11/15/2003 -0800 Gautam Mukunda wrote:
I would also point out that half of Washington has known
Valerie Plame was a CIA agent for years, so it's not
as if it's a major security breach either. None of
this, of course, came out in the
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people
to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another,
and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal
station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a
decent
--- Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where in the above does it say that you have to
reside within certian
borders to deserve these rights?
Doug
Nowhere. Which is why the Declaration is a wonderful
sentiment without force of law. Everyone on earth
_should have_ those rights.
At 09:16 AM 11/15/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 08:03:07AM -0600, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
Oh, good.
blow job = good
blow up nose = bad
Thank you for clearing that up for me.
You're welcome. You may now return to
At 08:59 PM 11/14/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/13/2003 11:55:12 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 10:54 PM 11/13/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone help me with a book or list of books to help me get a basic
understanding
At 04:41 PM 11/15/03 -0500, Bryon Daly wrote:
From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 04:36 PM 11/15/03 +0900, G. D. Akin wrote:
How many veterans on the list?
I'll start the count at 1.
2.
3
Not me. (Though my wife, father, step-father, 2 brothers-in-law, and many
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I presume you mean by 'Cult' a 'false religion'. But isn't a false
religion a religion too? Or if not, how do you tell the false ones
from
the true ones? And how can more than one be true?
Why does it have to be a false religion. I've always thought a
At 03:34 PM 11/15/03 -0600, Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: Explanation
On 15 Nov 2003, at 3:24 pm, Dan Minette wrote:
- Original
At 08:40 PM 11/15/03 +, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Julia Thompson wrote:
Alberto Monteiro - who would like to have all horoscopes
in the newspapers have their authors subject to being sued
when their predictions didn't come true :-)
But the ones I see are vague enough that there's be plenty
At 04:43 PM 11/15/03 -0800, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
--- Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes and no. I've seen Rumsfeld state that no trials
are neededthey can
be held indefinately without trial until the war on
terror ends. The
problems with this, compared to a war like WWII, are
At 05:13 PM 11/15/03 -0600, Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby Ridge..
--- Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you saying that the
At 06:47 PM 11/15/03 -0600, Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: christian dreams of murder...
--- Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] The
Bush
At 10:07 PM 11/15/2003 -0600, you wrote:
At 04:41 PM 11/15/03 -0500, Bryon Daly wrote:
From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 04:36 PM 11/15/03 +0900, G. D. Akin wrote:
How many veterans on the list?
I'll start the count at 1.
2.
3
Not me. (Though my wife, father,
At 11:00 PM 11/15/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:59 PM 11/14/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/13/2003 11:55:12 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 10:54 PM 11/13/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone help me with a book or
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
Here's a question for you, if you think the
Declaration should guide our actions. You supported
Judge Roy Moore, right? Endowed _by their Creator_
with certain inalienable rights... Not so good for
separation of church and state, is it?
Sufficiently ambiguous. Evolution
Kevin Tarr wrote:
I'm jealous. I signed up for the early enlistment program at the
earliest possible moment, 18 months before my ship out date. I got
credit for three other classmates enlisting. I think the first meant I'd
have extra service time credits and have been a higher pay-grade after
Thursday night got two phone calls, opinion polls. The first was general
about TV viewing, how many night a week did I watch TV between 8-10, what
channels did I mostly like, what types of shows.
The second was a long one about politics. I cannot say what organization it
was from. Some of the
At 07:49 PM 11/14/03 -0800, Deborah Harrell wrote:
Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deborah Harrell wrote:
Debbi
who found that, when camping, instant hot cocoa is
pretty good with a dollop of peppermint
schnapps... :}
Don't tempt me. :)
Julia
off alcohol for awhile
So its details youse wants? ;)
12K (tank Loader/Driver/Gunner), USANG, 28th ID(Mech).
Damon.
=
Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html
Now Building:
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
