Re: SCOUTED: Hotel Lost Liberty

2005-06-30 Thread Gary Denton
On 6/29/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 In a message dated 6/29/2005 2:59:57 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 If a burglar is someone guilty of burglary, if a glutton is someone 
 guilty
 of gluttony ... then God is an iron.
 -- Spider Robinson (1948 - ), Canadian science fiction writer.**
 
 **With more talent and less ego than Sawyer.


Met Sawyer this past weekend - didn't seem more ego prone than most writers 
and I am very impressed with his Human/Hominid trilogy.



News note if the UN behaved like the US:
 
 The UN today seized the island of Malta to
 dismantle it as it interfered with a direct shipping
 route to the Suez Canal.
 
 Vilyehm


Apropos of Malta and large bureaucracies the recently defeated EU new 
Constitution had a protocol of understandings regarding Malta that had 
detailed breakdowns of handling Malta vacation properties of different 
values. 

The REAL EU PREAMBLE according to EU leftists - We the government 
bureaucrats and large businesses of the European Union in order to promote 
the general welfare and establish universal taxing and trade authorities 
hereby establish this Constitution and all agreements, protocols and 
understandings herein considered incorporated to ensure the blessings of 
lifetime jobs and increased profits to us the real rulers.

--
Gary Denton
http://www.apollocon.org June 24-26, 2005

Easter Lemming Blogs
http://elemming.blogspot.com
http://elemming2.blogspot.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: SCOUTED: Hotel Lost Liberty

2005-06-30 Thread Travis Edmunds



From: Gary Denton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Subject: Re: SCOUTED: Hotel Lost Liberty
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 01:02:41 -0500

On 6/29/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 In a message dated 6/29/2005 2:59:57 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 If a burglar is someone guilty of burglary, if a glutton is someone
 guilty
 of gluttony ... then God is an iron.
 -- Spider Robinson (1948 - ), Canadian science fiction writer.**

 **With more talent and less ego than Sawyer.


Met Sawyer this past weekend - didn't seem more ego prone than most writers
and I am very impressed with his Human/Hominid trilogy.


I've only read Calculating God, but it was more than enough for me to label 
him a fairly decent writer all the same.


-Twavis

_
MSN® Calendar keeps you organized and takes the effort out of scheduling 
get-togethers. 
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-capage=byoa/premxAPID=1994DI=1034SU=http://hotmail.com/encaHL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines 
 Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the 
first two months FREE*.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: What is religion (was Re: Religion and social capital)

2005-06-30 Thread Leonard Matusik
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:16:13 -0400   Maru Dubshinki wrote:
 
on Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:20:49 +0100 William Goodall wrote:



On 27 Jun 2005, at 5:49 am, Warren Ockrassa wrote:


Though there are correlates. Loosely, the Kama Sutra and the 
Christian sacrament/communion can fall into those categories. One 
is sex for the purpose of interaction with deity; the other is 
 ritual deicide/cannibalism. Eat the enemy to get his power; eat the 
 god to become immortal.



I think the Christian sacrament is more like ca-nibble-ism because 
those wafers are really tiny :)

It would be a whole lot more fun if they transubstantiated some nice 
BBQ...


(How delicious, this thread is still running). William, I looked this up; and 
in order to be Kosher (sorry) the BBQ would have to be made of human flesh from 
a willing victim. (plus you'd have to get it approved by Rome) 
-- 


You think far too small, my dear William.  Just imagine all the time a
God-fearing Catholic could save if they got *themselves*
transubstaniated!

Uh, I kinda thought this was purported to be the whole *point* of christianity. 
Dating back 1900change years ago I believe. 

~Maru
skip straight to the big finale, neh?


As a R.C. myself, I really find this ritual deicide/cannabalism thing really 
appealing. It's so mammilian in it's character. Like breast feeding. Only a 
trancendant god is so transcendent that *It* can totally give *Itself* via 
obliteration to the nourishment of  *It's* children and not even be bothered by 
it in the long run. In addition, we have the archetypical modus of human 
interaction (that of food sharing) elevated to the status of transcendence 
itself.  very cool.It might be *only* a symbol but I believe it's a darn 
good one.

Now Catholics also have ritual sex for the purposes of interacting with a 
diety. It is called marriage. (references available upon request) Some 
feminists have decride marriage as ritualized prostitution and I would say 
, they probably have a point.  While the sex itself is not usually 
ritualized (except by the most *daring*:)) it's placement in society as an 
Institution makes it defacto ritualized. Or so it would seem. In addition, this 
ritualization does also seem to be a primary architype, much like food sharing 
behaviors.  It crosses cultural boundaries and predates the christian eras.
LeonardJMatusik [EMAIL PROTECTED]


A bad thing done for a good cause is still a bad thing. It's why so 
few people slap their political opponents. That, and because slapping 
looks so silly. - Randy Cohen.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l





-
Yahoo! Sports
 Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Admin info

2005-06-30 Thread Julia Thompson


On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:

 At 03:24 PM Wednesday 6/29/2005, Julia Thompson wrote:
 
 
 On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Julia Thompson wrote:
 
 
 
 I have some of my stuff back up and running, but not Thunderbird yet,
 which is what I use to check the usual administration address.  (Need to
 get all my mail folders, etc. moved over, and if I don't block out 30
 minutes for it, it'll take 60, but if I block out the 30 minutes, it'll
 only take 10.  Or so it seems to go.)
 
 
 
 Don't bet on the latter.  Bet on the former being ridiculously optimistic, 
 especially if you total up the time from all of the multiple times you will 
 have to repeat the process until it works correctly (and it may not be 
 obviously working incorrectly for several hours/days//weeks until suddenly 
 everything comes to a screeching halt).
 
 (This applies to _any_ task involving computers.  Especially the ones which 
 are obviously so simple and straightforward that they should take no more 
 than 10 minutes.)

I went to check the e-mail on the web, and the password isn't working.  :)  
So no getting it all in shape until I have a working password  (I'm 
sleeping with the admin, though, so I figure I can get it taken care of 
before too much longer)

I'll have that up tomorrow evening
 or sometime Friday.  (Got a date with my hubby tonight -- married 14 years
 ago today!)
 
 
 
 Congratulations!  Happy anniversary!
 
 
 
 And I still need to install the camera software and the genealogy
 software, but that'll wait until the mail stuff is up and running
 properly.  :)
 
 
 
 IOW, maybe sometime in the fall¹ . . .
 
 
 (¹Note that a year is not specified.)
 
 
 Voice Of Experience Maru

1)  Genealogy software, maybe.  About all I have to do is beat on the 
cousin who gave us a database about at least one DOB being totally wrong, 
maybe more stuff, besides.  But I have to find the disk first.

2)  Can't download pictures from the camera without having that software 
installed, and as soon as I find the disk, there I am.  Really.  I think 
it's somewhere on my desk  (Hey, the Palm software was, and I *had* to 
have that up and running yesterday to extract some info as to whether or 
not an appointment had been made for yesterday afternoon, so's I could be 
ready for it if it had been scheduled for then.)

Gotta go play with Sam for awhile while his siblings are napping.  :)

Julia

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Fwd: NASA RESEARCHERS DISCOVER PLANET WITH LARGEST SOLID CORE

2005-06-30 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

Erica Hupp
Headquarters, Washington  June 30, 2005
(Phone: 202/358-1237)

RELEASE: 05-169

NASA RESEARCHERS DISCOVER PLANET WITH LARGEST SOLID CORE

 NASA researchers recently discovered the largest solid
core ever found in an extrasolar planet, and their discovery
confirms a planet formation theory.

For theorists, the discovery of a planet with such a large
core is as important as the discovery of the first
extrasolar planet around the star 51 Pegasi in 1995, said
Shigeru Ida, theorist from the Tokyo Institute of
Technology, Japan.

When a consortium of American, Japanese and Chilean
astronomers first looked at this planet, they expected one
similar to Jupiter. None of our models predicted that
nature could make a planet like the one we are studying,
said Bun'ei Sato, consortium member and postdoctoral fellow
at Okayama Astrophysical Observatory, Japan.

Scientists have rarely had opportunities like this to
collect such solid evidence about planet formation. More
than 150 extrasolar planets have been discovered by
observing changes in the speed of a star, as it moves toward
and away from Earth. The changes in speed are caused by the
gravitational pull of planets.

This planet also passes in front of its star and dims the
starlight. When that happens, we are able to calculate the
physical size of the planet, whether it has a solid core,
and even what its atmosphere is like, said Debra Fischer.
She is consortium team leader and professor of astronomy at
San Francisco State University, Calif.

The planet, orbiting the sun-like star HD 149026, is roughly
equal in mass to Saturn, but it is significantly smaller in
diameter. It takes just 2.87 days to circle its star, and
the upper atmosphere temperature is approximately 2,000
degrees Fahrenheit. Modeling of the planet's structure shows
it has a solid core approximately 70 times Earth's mass.

This is the first observational evidence that proves the
core accretion theory about how planets are formed.
Scientists have two competing but viable theories about
planet formation.

In the gravitational instability theory, planets form
during a rapid collapse of a dense cloud. With the core
accretion theory, planets start as small rock-ice cores
that grow as they gravitationally acquire additional mass.
Scientists believe the large, rocky core of this planet
could not have formed by cloud collapse. They think it must
have grown a core first, and then acquired gas.

This is a confirmation of the core accretion theory for
planet formation and evidence that planets of this kind
should exist in abundance, said Greg Henry, an astronomer
at Tennessee State University, Nashville. He detected the
dimming of the star by the planet with his robotic
telescopes at Fairborn Observatory in Mount Hopkins,
Arizona.

Support for this research came from NASA, the National
Astronomical Observatory of Japan and the National Science
Foundation.

A paper about this discovery was accepted for publication in
the Astrophysical Journal. The paper, supporting materials
and illustrations are available on the Internet at:

http://tauceti.sfsu.edu/n2k/

For information about NASA and agency programs on the
Internet, visit:

http://www.nasa.gov/home/index.html

-end-





* * *

NASA press releases and other information are available automatically
by sending an Internet electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message (not the subject line) users should type
the words subscribe press-release (no quotes).  The system will
reply with a confirmation via E-mail of each subscription.  A second
automatic message will include additional information on the service.
NASA releases also are available via CompuServe using the command
GO NASA.  To unsubscribe from this mailing list, address an E-mail
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], leave the subject blank, and type only
unsubscribe press-release (no quotes) in the body of the message.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Admin info

2005-06-30 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

At 01:26 PM Thursday 6/30/2005, Julia Thompson wrote:



1)  Genealogy software, maybe.  About all I have to do is beat on the
cousin who gave us a database about at least one DOB being totally wrong,



Based on what?  Frex, I have copies of three supposedly official 
documents (marriage certificate, WWI military records, census record) each 
of which gives a different YOB (while agreeing on the month and day) for my 
father's father . . .



Complex Roots Maru


-- Ronn!  :)


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Admin info

2005-06-30 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

At 07:46 PM Thursday 6/30/2005, Julia Thompson wrote:



On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:

 At 01:26 PM Thursday 6/30/2005, Julia Thompson wrote:


 1)  Genealogy software, maybe.  About all I have to do is beat on the
 cousin who gave us a database about at least one DOB being totally wrong,


 Based on what?  Frex, I have copies of three supposedly official
 documents (marriage certificate, WWI military records, census record)
 each of which gives a different YOB (while agreeing on the month and
 day) for my father's father . . .


 Complex Roots Maru

Well, I've seen the birth certificate of the person in question.  :)



AFAIK there was no contemporarily-issued birth certificate for my 
grandfather . . . of course, he was born on a rural farm before the 
beginning of the 20th century . . .



-- Ronn!  :)


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Admin info

2005-06-30 Thread Julia Thompson


On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:

 At 07:46 PM Thursday 6/30/2005, Julia Thompson wrote:
 
 
 On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
 
   At 01:26 PM Thursday 6/30/2005, Julia Thompson wrote:
  
  
   1)  Genealogy software, maybe.  About all I have to do is beat on the
   cousin who gave us a database about at least one DOB being totally wrong,
  
  
   Based on what?  Frex, I have copies of three supposedly official
   documents (marriage certificate, WWI military records, census record)
   each of which gives a different YOB (while agreeing on the month and
   day) for my father's father . . .
  
  
   Complex Roots Maru
 
 Well, I've seen the birth certificate of the person in question.  :)
 
 
 AFAIK there was no contemporarily-issued birth certificate for my 
 grandfather . . . of course, he was born on a rural farm before the 
 beginning of the 20th century . . .

Let's just say that if the genealogy file given to me were put up on
Rootsweb, about 80% of the people in it would have no info besides last
name viewable by anyone besides the owner of it

(Rootsweb hides data aside from last name for anyone assumed to be living,
i.e. anyone under 70 without a date of death in the database)

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-06-30 Thread Gary Nunn
WARNING !!!
 
MAJOR spoilers below
 
S
 
P
 
O
 
I
 
L
 
E
 
R
  
S
 
P
 
A
 
C
 
E
 
 
I saw War of the Worlds tonight, and I really liked it except for a few
major plot holes and inconsistencies.
 
I don't usually pick apart plot holes, but these are bugging me
 
1. If the tripods were all buried hundreds of years ago, why didn't someone
accidentally find at least one?
 
2. If the aliens were here hundreds of years ago, why didn't they take over
the planet then, when there would have been no resistance?
 
3. Why didn't the aliens become infected with a virus (or bacteria) the
first time they were here to bury the ships?
 
 

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-06-30 Thread Julia Thompson


On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Gary Nunn wrote:

 WARNING !!!
  
 MAJOR spoilers below
  
 S
  
 P
  
 O
  
 I
  
 L
  
 E
  
 R
   
 S
  
 P
  
 A
  
 C
  
 E
  
  
 I saw War of the Worlds tonight, and I really liked it except for a few
 major plot holes and inconsistencies.
  
 I don't usually pick apart plot holes, but these are bugging me
  
  
 3. Why didn't the aliens become infected with a virus (or bacteria) the
 first time they were here to bury the ships?

The virus or bacteria mutated between the time the ships were buried and 
now?  That seems very plausible to me, anyway.

Julia

whose last trip to the theater was to see The Incredibles at full price 
(and worth every penny, too!)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-06-30 Thread Gary Nunn
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julia Thompson
 Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 12:08 AM
 To: Killer Bs Discussion
 Subject: Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS
 
 
 
 On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Gary Nunn wrote:
 
  WARNING !!!
   
  MAJOR spoilers below
   
  S
   
  P
   
  O
   
  I
   
  L
   
  E
   
  R

  S
   
  P
   
  A
   
  C
   
  E
   
   
  I saw War of the Worlds tonight, and I really liked it except for a 
  few major plot holes and inconsistencies.
   
  I don't usually pick apart plot holes, but these are bugging me
   
   
  3. Why didn't the aliens become infected with a virus (or bacteria) 
  the first time they were here to bury the ships?
 
 The virus or bacteria mutated between the time the ships were 
 buried and now?  That seems very plausible to me, anyway.
   Julia


Ok, I could buy that, but why didn't they just stay the first time instead
of burying ships and leaving?

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-06-30 Thread Julia Thompson


On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Gary Nunn wrote:

  
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julia Thompson
  Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 12:08 AM
  To: Killer Bs Discussion
  Subject: Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS
  
  
  
  On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Gary Nunn wrote:
  
   WARNING !!!

   MAJOR spoilers below

   S

   P

   O

   I

   L

   E

   R
 
   S

   P

   A

   C

   E


   I saw War of the Worlds tonight, and I really liked it except for a 
   few major plot holes and inconsistencies.

   I don't usually pick apart plot holes, but these are bugging me


   3. Why didn't the aliens become infected with a virus (or bacteria) 
   the first time they were here to bury the ships?
  
  The virus or bacteria mutated between the time the ships were 
  buried and now?  That seems very plausible to me, anyway.
  Julia
 
 
 Ok, I could buy that, but why didn't they just stay the first time instead
 of burying ships and leaving?

That, I could not tell you.  :)

Julia

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Plot Holes: War of the worlds - SPOILERS

2005-06-30 Thread Russell Chapman

Gary Nunn wrote:


WARNING !!!

MAJOR spoilers below

S

P

O

I

L

E

R
 
S


P

A

C

E


I saw War of the Worlds tonight, and I really liked it except for a few
major plot holes and inconsistencies.

2. If the aliens were here hundreds of years ago, why didn't they take over
the planet then, when there would have been no resistance?

3. Why didn't the aliens become infected with a virus (or bacteria) the
first time they were here to bury the ships?
 

Not having seen it, maybe I shouldn't comment, but couldn't the ones 
burying the ships have died from bacteria?
Could the advance party have been an invasion force first wave that came 
to set the equipment in place, but when they succumbed to the bacteria, 
the military chiefs on Mars were waiting for a signal which never came, 
and so it took all this time to mount a new attack?


Cheers
Russell C.




---
This email (including any attachments) is confidential
and copyright. The School makes no warranty about the
content of this email. Unless expressly stated, this
email does not bind the School and does not necessarily
constitute the opinion of the School.

If you have received this email in error, please delete
it and notify the sender.
---
GWAVAsig
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


I think I'm back

2005-06-30 Thread Julia Thompson
I think I'm back.  Had some problems with copying mail folders to the 
right place, and I lost a few non-list e-mails in the process, but other 
than that, I think I'm back in business.


If this piece of listmail goes to the right folder, that'll be a good 
start.  :)


Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: I think I'm back

2005-06-30 Thread Julia Thompson

Julia Thompson wrote:
I think I'm back.  Had some problems with copying mail folders to the 
right place, and I lost a few non-list e-mails in the process, but other 
than that, I think I'm back in business.


If this piece of listmail goes to the right folder, that'll be a good 
start.  :)


It did.  :)

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l