Re: Gulags L3

2005-07-07 Thread Gary Denton
On 7/1/05, Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Gary Denton [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Answering your thoughtful post.

 Then it would seem that all AQ has to answer is name rank and serial
 number, right?

I don't think so.  What is prohibited is usually considered, based on
article 130: grave breaches to which the preceding Article relates
shall be those involving any of the following acts, if committed
against persons or property protected by the Convention: willful
killing, torture or inhuman treatment, including biological
experiments, willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to
body or health, compelling a prisoner of war to serve in the forces of
the hostile Power, or willfully depriving a prisoner of war of the
rights of fair and regular trial prescribed in this Convention.

That would mean things that are not torture and is not causing great
suffering or serious injury to body or health might be permitted
depending on how far you go.  A lot of the debate within officials
with long experience and the new political appointees based on leaked
memos are explorations as to what extent techniques like water
boarding (drowning without killing) and sleep deprivation and long
periods of times in uncomfortable positions (that actually do cause
long-term damage) and techniques that are extremely painful but leave
no permanent damage (electrodes anyone?) are lawful. Do we really want
to explore this?  You want to interrogate someone - should you have
the guards rough up the prisoners for several days before the
interrogation as long as they leave no permanent physical scars? 
Several of the people released after over a year and never charged
have long-term disabilities now.

   No carrot, no stick at all, is the way I read the Geneva Conventions on
   POWs.  Is that what you think should be the case?

I think that must come from the controversial Article 17 - No
physical or mental torture, nor any other form of coercion, may be
inflicted on prisoners of war to secure from them information of any
kind whatever. Prisoners of war who refuse to answer may not be
threatened, insulted, or exposed to any unpleasant or disadvantageous
treatment of any kind.   This does not preclude classic plea
bargaining - that is, the offer of leniency in return for cooperation
- or other incentives. Plea bargaining and related incentives has been
used repeatedly with success to induce cooperation from members of
other violent criminal enterprises such as the Mafia or drug
traffickers.

 
  Unpleasant results...  I am opposed to using torture in the name of
  democracy.
  I am wondering if you are minimizing or are truly unaware of some of
  the things classified under unpleasant results which in places
  outside of Gitmo have included torturing people to death.
 
 No, I'm not doing that.  I'm trying to obtain first and understanding of
 what has been going on, and then trying to form a reasonable opinion about
 it.  I don't think that when the Geneva Convention talks about
 unpleasantness that they were using a euphemism for torture.  I took it as,
 well, unpleasantness.  For example, you could not interrupt the sleep of
 people who aren't talking.  You couldn't change their diet from a tasty one
 to one that is nutritious, follows their dietary laws, but is rather
 tasteless and bland.  You couldn't impose solitary confinement for refusing
 to talk.  You couldn't shine lights in their cell.

1st - I think historically article 17 has not been interpreted
strictly.  2nd - Who do you want to cause unpleasantness to and why? 
3rd To what degree do you want to cause unpleasantness?  4th - Is
there any evidence this unpleasantness is effective?  5th Aren't there
undesirable consequence to using these techniques, in the reliability
of information obtained, in brutalizing our guards as well as the
prisoners, in our standards of decency, in the world's opinion of us,
in God's eyes? 6th A long history of research in torture and brutal
interrogation techniques shows it is not effective.  What might be
called plea bargaining deals and a long process of extracting
information in a relatively cooperative atmosphere has been shown to
be much more accurate.

 Basically, it appears that prisoners should be as well treated as one's own
 soldiers until the war is over.  You can't even refuse them cigarettes as a
 means of getting them to talk. That's what I'm referring to when I write of
 unpleasantness.

And where did you find this interpretation? I eventually found article
17 in looking through the articles.

 The killing of prisoners who are not engaged in life threatening activities
 (e.g. an armed prison riot) is not acceptable.  Torturing prisoners is not
 acceptable; particularly ones that are not likely to have information that
 can save hundreds or thousands of lives.  The actions depicted in the Time
 report looks to be on the borderline to me.  That's why I copied the
 details of that and asked 

Re: The Oldest American?

2005-07-07 Thread Leonard Matusik
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 12:02:28 -0700 Warren wrote:



Maybe the earliest settlers came over in skin boats? Were washed out to 
sea by a typhoon and fetched up on the shores of, say, what's now 
Chile? After all the Polynesians were astoundingly good seafarers. It's 
not that far from Rapa Nui to the continent, if you've already crossed 
the Pacific island chains.


--
...especially if one has the balls to do it..

LeonardMatusik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l




-
Discover Yahoo!
 Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online  more. Check it out!
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: The Oldest American?

2005-07-07 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Julia Thompson wrote:

 BTW: the article says that Luiza is pt_BR
 version of Lucy, and this is wrong [Lucy becomes Lucia, Luiza
 is a different name]

 Luiza would maybe be Louise or Louisa?  That's my guess, anyway

Yep. And Julia is Julia :-)

Alberto Monteiro

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: The Oldest American?

2005-07-07 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Warren Ockrassa wrote:

 Maybe the earliest settlers came over in skin boats? Were washed out to
 sea by a typhoon and fetched up on the shores of, say, what's now
 Chile? After all the Polynesians were astoundingly good seafarers. It's
 not that far from Rapa Nui to the continent, if you've already crossed
 the Pacific island chains.

I would bet the same way Pedro Alvares Cabral allegedly[*] came:
by navigating away from African's coast, being caught in the
Brazilian Sea Current, and hitting Brazil's Northeast.

Alberto Monteiro

[*] the official version is that he came here by accident - but
skeptics doubted it even back in 1500.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: The Oldest American?

2005-07-07 Thread Dave Land

On Jul 7, 2005, at 2:33 PM, Alberto Monteiro wrote:


Julia Thompson wrote:



BTW: the article says that Luiza is pt_BR
version of Lucy, and this is wrong [Lucy becomes Lucia, Luiza
is a different name]


Luiza would maybe be Louise or Louisa?  That's my guess, anyway


Yep. And Julia is Julia :-)


And may be pronounced HOO-lee-ah or YOO-lee-ah.

Dave

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: The Oldest American?

2005-07-07 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Gary Denton wrote:

 The problem with any new theory is old professors who made their
 reputations on the old theories and control research grants and
 publication usually until they die off. 

No, the problem with any new theory is that it was probably
proposed by some loony outsider who knows nothing about
the old theory, and doesn't fear being ridiculed. For each 1,000
crazy theories, one [or less] comes true.

Alberto Monteiro

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: The Oldest American?

2005-07-07 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Dave Land wrote:

 Yep. And Julia is Julia :-)

 And may be pronounced HOO-lee-ah or YOO-lee-ah.

No. This is Spanish pronunciation. Brazilian _J-_ sounds like
French.

Alberto Monteiro

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: The Oldest American?

2005-07-07 Thread Dave Land

On Jul 7, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Alberto Monteiro wrote:


Dave Land wrote:



Yep. And Julia is Julia :-)


And may be pronounced HOO-lee-ah or YOO-lee-ah.


No. This is Spanish pronunciation. Brazilian _J-_ sounds like
French.


So it's a kind of ZHOO-lee-ah, I guess?

I had a friend who spent some time in Brazil who told me that the
R in Rio is pronounced something like the American H. Was she full
of it?

Dave

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: The Oldest American?

2005-07-07 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Dave Land wrote:

 No. This is Spanish pronunciation. Brazilian _J-_ sounds like
 French.

 So it's a kind of ZHOO-lee-ah, I guess?

Yes - whatever ZH means :-)

 I had a friend who spent some time in Brazil who told me that the
 R in Rio is pronounced something like the American H. Was she full
 of it?

She is half right, because Portuguese has two different _r_ sounds.
Words like caro and carro are different words, and pronounced
differently. The first one sounds like Italian, Spanish, or Austrian-German
_r_. The second one sounds like French or German _r_. It's the second
one that becomes the _h_.

Alberto [*] Monteiro

[*] sounds like Aw-beh-to :-)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: The Oldest American?

2005-07-07 Thread Julia Thompson

Alberto Monteiro wrote:

Dave Land wrote:


Yep. And Julia is Julia :-)


And may be pronounced HOO-lee-ah or YOO-lee-ah.



No. This is Spanish pronunciation. Brazilian _J-_ sounds like
French.


I like the French pronunciation better than the Spanish one.

My Spanish teacher in high school called me Juliana (with proper Spanish 
pronunciation, of course).  I think she just liked saying that better 
than saying Julia.  :)  Neither Spanish nor English was her first 
language, but she was fluent in Spanish and not quite fluent in English. 
 (Some weird constructions, such as conditionals, she used Spanish 
grammar and English words, which sounded a little weird, but I learned 
the Spanish conditional more easily because she did that.)


Julia

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Fwd: Top5 - 7/7/05 - Things You Don't Want to Hear From Tech Support

2005-07-07 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

==
Betcha can't read just one.
 
 T  H  E T  O  P 5 L  I  S  T
 
  http://www.topfive.com
==


   July 7, 2005


Today's list was originally published on January 28, 1997.


 The Top 5 Things You Don't Want to Hear From Tech Support


 5 I'm sorry, Dave.  I'm afraid I can't do that.

 4 In layman's terms, we call that the Hindenburg Effect.

 3 Hold on a second...  Mom! Timmy's hitting me!

 2 Okay, turn to page 523 in your copy of 'Dianetics.'


 and TopFive.com's Number 1 Thing You
Don't Want to Hear From Tech Support...


 1 Please hold for Mr. Gates' attorney.




 Join ClubTop5 to see the whole 15-item list!
  http://www.topfive.com/html/clubtop5.shtml



 [   The Top 5 List  www.topfive.com   ]
 [   Copyright 1997, 2005 by Chris White   ]



==
Selected from 83 submissions from 31 contributors.
Today's Top Five List authors are:
--
George Olson, Colorado Springs, CO--  1   (9th #1)
R.M. Weiner, Brighton, MA --  2
John Voigt, Chicago, IL   --  3
Alan Smithee, Sugar Land, TX  --  4
Jeff Downey, Raleigh, NC  --  5
Chris White, New York, NY -- List owner/editor

==

  Rumination of the Day

If I had the chance to go on The Jerry Springer
  Show, I would kill everyone I know the night
 before, so that when Jerry says, Well, Andrew,
   we've got a surprise for you, I could say,
No, Jerry -- I have a surprise for you!!

 (Andrew)

  To subscribe to Ruminations:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

==
   Copyright 2005 by Chris White   All rights reserved.
 Do not publish or broadcast without permission.
--
 To subscribe, send e-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To unsubscribe: Click on the EASY UNSUBSCRIBE link below.
 Address changes?  Problems?  General bitching?  Lonely?
Let us know:  http://www.topfive.com/contact.shtml
--
 T  H  E T  O  P 5 L  I  S  T
 TOPFIVE -- The Web's Best Original Humor  http://www.topfive.com
==

Your free subscription is supported by today's sponsor:
---
Need a Laptop? Get a Sony Vaio Laptop Free!
http://click.topica.com/caadHlxclvXASbpbeb3f/ProductTestPanel
---

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: The Oldest American?

2005-07-07 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

At 04:35 PM Thursday 7/7/2005, Dave Land wrote:

On Jul 7, 2005, at 2:33 PM, Alberto Monteiro wrote:


Julia Thompson wrote:



BTW: the article says that Luiza is pt_BR
version of Lucy, and this is wrong [Lucy becomes Lucia, Luiza
is a different name]


Luiza would maybe be Louise or Louisa?  That's my guess, anyway

Yep. And Julia is Julia :-)


And may be pronounced HOO-lee-ah or YOO-lee-ah.



Particularly during the months of Hoon and Hooly . . .


-- Ronn!  :)


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: The Oldest American?

2005-07-07 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

At 04:41 PM Thursday 7/7/2005, Alberto Monteiro wrote:

Gary Denton wrote:

 The problem with any new theory is old professors who made their
 reputations on the old theories and control research grants and
 publication usually until they die off.

No, the problem with any new theory is that it was probably
proposed by some loony outsider who knows nothing about
the old theory, and doesn't fear being ridiculed. For each 1,000
crazy theories, one [or less] comes true.



Or C.  Both of the above.


The Looney Outsider Was Often A Respected Insider Until He Disagreed With 
The PTB Maru



-- Ronn!  :)


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: The Oldest American?

2005-07-07 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

At 05:38 PM Thursday 7/7/2005, Julia Thompson wrote:

Alberto Monteiro wrote:

Dave Land wrote:


Yep. And Julia is Julia :-)


And may be pronounced HOO-lee-ah or YOO-lee-ah.

No. This is Spanish pronunciation. Brazilian _J-_ sounds like
French.


I like the French pronunciation better than the Spanish one.

My Spanish teacher in high school called me Juliana (with proper Spanish 
pronunciation, of course).  I think she just liked saying that better than 
saying Julia.  :)  Neither Spanish nor English was her first language,




What was?



but she was fluent in Spanish and not quite fluent in English.  (Some 
weird constructions, such as conditionals, she used Spanish grammar and 
English words, which sounded a little weird, but I learned the Spanish 
conditional more easily because she did that.)



Curious Maru


-- Ronn!  :)


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: The Oldest American?

2005-07-07 Thread Julia Thompson

Ronn!Blankenship wrote:

At 05:38 PM Thursday 7/7/2005, Julia Thompson wrote:


Alberto Monteiro wrote:


Dave Land wrote:


Yep. And Julia is Julia :-)



And may be pronounced HOO-lee-ah or YOO-lee-ah.


No. This is Spanish pronunciation. Brazilian _J-_ sounds like
French.



I like the French pronunciation better than the Spanish one.

My Spanish teacher in high school called me Juliana (with proper 
Spanish pronunciation, of course).  I think she just liked saying that 
better than saying Julia.  :)  Neither Spanish nor English was her 
first language,



What was?


Greek.  She was born in Greece, studied in Spain at one point.

She was quite a character.  (And it's too darn late for me to elaborate; 
one of the better stories that I have would take too long for me to type 
at this point.)


Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Software installation progress

2005-07-07 Thread Julia Thompson
I think I've got all the software installed except the genealogical 
program.  And I got pictures off my digital camera and onto my Palm this 
evening.  :)  (Got some nice ones of each of the kids in the last few 
days.  Well, one great one of each, and some nice action shots.)


And we send the defective hard drive back tomorrow.

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l