RE: Someone Must Tell Them

2006-10-01 Thread Ritu

Robert G. Seeberger 

 On 9/27/2006 2:01:04 PM, Richard Baker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

  One of the most striking things about the July 7 attacks was how 
  utterly unterrified we all were. I know people who were 
 very close to
  the bombing attacks and their response was uniformly calm and
  practical. In fact, those attacks seemed to cause more anxiety and
  fear on the other side of the Atlantic than they did here.

 I don't know how it may appear from over there, but on 9/11 I was 
 angry. Heck I was angry on July 7 and after Madrid and Bali 
 too. I think the only times I felt much in the way of fear 
 was in regard to 
 the Anthrax cases and the sniper case, those things just seemed more 
 likely to grow where it could harm people I knew and cared 
 about. I don't think I actually can remember anyone who was 
 frightened, but I 
 do remember lots of folks who were royally pissed off.

You, of course, are the best judge of your reactions and emotions, but
it is also a fact that fear often manifests itself as anger.

 Perhaps it was different in other parts of the country, but even if 
 Americans do not uniformly project calm I would suggest that the fear 
 that was sensed was coming from the administration and the news 
 media's attempts to whip up a frenzy of ad sales.

The administration certainly worked on selling the fear, the media
definitely bought into it, but so did the citizens. At least that is how
it appears from here. The massive support for the Iraq war, the frequent
invocation of the mushroom cloud during arguments and debates in the
run-up to the same war, all such things strongly suggested fear.

Ritu

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Someone Must Tell Them

2006-10-01 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

At 12:55 AM Sunday 10/1/2006, Ritu wrote:


Warren Ockrassa wrote:

  Well, look at the bright side - at least Abu Ghraib isn't a scandal
  anymore. It is now the law...

 Which is of course the point. Bush wants to keep his ass from being
 impeached under an opposition congress.

I've seen plenty of people, theoretically working for public good,
subvert laws and institutions of a country. But this is the first time
I've ever seen a near complete subversion of a constitution. Bush  Co
make the BJP look good,



BJP?


-- Ronn!  :)



___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Shiny

2006-10-01 Thread Julia Thompson

Warren Ockrassa wrote:

On Sep 30, 2006, at 7:00 AM, Reggie Bautista wrote:


it's a full 40% brighter than the 20-inch model.


So you're suggesting there's a correlation between waist size and IQ?

[Obscurity 'R' Us]


Hm.  Depending on which way that goes, my recent surgery may be an 
experiment in artificial intelligence!  ;)


(I knew a blonde who would get her hair dyed a fairly light red, that 
went well with her coloring, and called it her experiment with 
artificial intelligence.  I liked her.)


Julia

smaller waist once things are all healed up
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Someone Must Tell Them

2006-10-01 Thread Julia Thompson

Ronn!Blankenship wrote:

At 12:55 AM Sunday 10/1/2006, Ritu wrote:


Warren Ockrassa wrote:

  Well, look at the bright side - at least Abu Ghraib isn't a scandal
  anymore. It is now the law...

 Which is of course the point. Bush wants to keep his ass from being
 impeached under an opposition congress.

I've seen plenty of people, theoretically working for public good,
subvert laws and institutions of a country. But this is the first time
I've ever seen a near complete subversion of a constitution. Bush  Co
make the BJP look good,



BJP?


It's a political party in India.  I don't remember much about it, 
though.  I'm sure Ritu will be more enlightening.  :)


Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11conspiracies)

2006-10-01 Thread Nick Arnett

On 9/30/06, Reggie Bautista [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




There's a certain truthiness to that...



That's because I was being probalogical!

Nick


--
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages: 408-904-7198
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11conspiracies)

2006-10-01 Thread Julia Thompson

Nick Arnett wrote:

On 9/30/06, Reggie Bautista [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




There's a certain truthiness to that...



That's because I was being probalogical!


Are you sure that word is cromulent?

Julia


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11conspiracies)

2006-10-01 Thread Medievalbk
 
In a message dated 10/1/2006 8:21:03 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Are you  sure that word is cromulent?

Julia



Crom never lent Conan anything.
 
Vilyehm
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Someone Must Tell Them

2006-10-01 Thread Ritu

Ronn!Blankenship asked:

 I've seen plenty of people, theoretically working for public good, 
 subvert laws and institutions of a country. But this is the 
 first time 
 I've ever seen a near complete subversion of a constitution. 
 Bush  Co 
 make the BJP look good,
 
 
 BJP?

Bhartiya Janata Party. A political party in India, and one I love to
hate. They are the modern version of the Jan Sangh, and actually enjoyed
a few years in power. 

BJP has traditionally been the political party of Brahmins but in mid
80s they hit upon the idea of 'Hindutva', and of a glorious Hindu
nation. Since positivity doesn't bring immediate political dividends,
they started off with maligning the muslims. They are pretty good at
playing the fear card and circulated a lot of nonsense about how Hindus
have been oppressed in India for centuries. I used to laugh at their
obvious attempts [in my defense, I was in my early twenties back then],
but with the destruction of the Babri Masjid, I realised that people
actually bought into that nonsense. Once the media attention was focused
on them, they scored plenty of points off their political opposition by
charging them with 'appeasement of muslims'. BJP's tactics increased
their popularity, and finally they were able to form a coalition
government in the centre.

At that point, their campaign against the minorities started in earnest.
Christians and Muslims bore the brunt of it [Staines' murder, and the
Gujarat riots were only the most public of their crimes]. However, the
pogrom in Gujarat put off plenty of people, and when the BJP called for
early elections is 2004, fully expecting to win, they were voted out of
power. At least at the national level. A few states are still run by the
BJP, and those are the states where anti-conversion laws are being
passed.

Really nasty people, propagating the most hateful of ideas under the
guise of patriotism and national security. Its sister organisations, the
RSS and the VHP, are equally bad.

Ritu
GCU Brief

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: 9/11 conspiracies (WAS RE: What should we believe when there is no reliab...

2006-10-01 Thread Bemmzim
 
In a message dated 9/27/2006 5:44:45 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Which  can take years or even decades.  Another example
from medicine that I  am hard put to explain, except to
think that no one _wanted_ to believe  such a thing was
so widespread, is something that I was still taught  in
the mid '80s:  Gonorrhea is a sexually transmitted
disease,  except that in some cases where children must
be sharing bathwater or  toweling with infected
adult(s), they can become  infected.




Big changes should take years to be accepted. They must prove themselves  
against the older established theory. In the process of exploring the new  
theories many unanticipated facts become known and science moves into anew  
direction. 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


PC Software - prices high, little choice

2006-10-01 Thread William T Goodall

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/5396488.stm

Tesco is to launch a range of budget own-brand PC software, in a  
move that will pitch the grocery giant against the likes of Microsoft  
and Symantec.


Tesco said it would offer six packages, including office software,  
security systems and a photo editing tool.
Britain's biggest retailer said each title would cost less than £20,  
challenging what it described as the current high price of PC  
software.


[...]

'When it comes to software there is little choice and prices are  
high - our new range of software changes this

Daniel Cook', Tesco


Obviously they didn't launch a range of Mac software since there is  
already a huge range of reasonably priced software for Macs.


And they don't crash all the time either Maru

--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/

What's the difference between OS X and Vista?

Microsoft employees are excited about OS X...

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: PC Software - prices high, little choice

2006-10-01 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 2 Oct 2006 at 0:16, William T Goodall wrote:

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/5396488.stm

 Obviously they didn't launch a range of Mac software since there is
 already a huge range of reasonably priced software for Macs.

No, obvipusly because they're a niche market segment for which there
is simply not the installed base to interest a supermarket.

And it's a utter ripoff, still, for office software. For PC *and* Mac
(and Linux, and...), Open Office is £0.00 (Or £3.50 on CD and mailed
from several places)

 And they don't crash all the time either Maru

Oh? They just have security holes. Which Apple tries to hide.

http://kierenmccarthy.co.uk/2006/09/26/apple-and-security-abuse-and-
ignorance/#more-578

(Which lead to a DDoS attack on his blog...)

AndrewC
Dawn Falcon

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Week 4 NFL Picks

2006-10-01 Thread Julia Thompson

John D. Giorgis wrote:

I was a poor 8-6 last week, taking me to 29 - 17 for the season.   The
Upset Special, though is 3-0 after the Saint came marching back in to
New Orleans in a big way.Can I keep the streak going?

.
.
.

Dallas at Tennessee - On paper, this is a gross mismatch.  But with the
huge Terrell Owens distraction this week, Tennessee at home, and just
possibly getting Kerry Collins fully up-to-speed finally, I sniff an
upset. Pick: TITANS UPSET SPECIAL


Apparently not.  :P

Vince Young has a lot to learn about the NFL.

Although I was SO not surprised when he ran in the 2-point conversion. 
(Was anyone surprised?)


The 2 interceptions just killed them.

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies

2006-10-01 Thread Dave Land

On Sep 28, 2006, at 8:45 PM, jdiebremse wrote:


--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mauro Diotallevi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

My grandmother used to say two things about this depending on her
mood; either Catholic heirarchy created this reverence of Mary
because she's the most submissive role model those guys in Rome
could find


Which isn't exactly true.   of course, her submission to God's  
will

in The Annunciation story has long been a model for Christians, she
nevertheless is one of the only people recorded in the Bible as not  
just
openly disagreeing with Jesus, but as also succeeding in changing  
Jesus'

(God's) mind!   There's something to be said for that!


And there's something rather profound to be said for the fact that God's
mind can be changed. The stories of Abraham and Isaac and of the
destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah reveal a surprisingly human view of
God.

If you believe that the Bible is the inerrant revelation of God to man,
these stories may present some problems. If you believe that the Bible
is a human-authored story of their striving to understand God and their
relationship to God, then they represent a particular stage in the
development of that understanding.

In any event, it suggests that, to the believer, prayer is not a waste
of time if God is willing to be moved.

Dave

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies)

2006-10-01 Thread Dave Land

On Sep 29, 2006, at 7:56 PM, Nick Arnett wrote:


On 9/29/06, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


No, it's the SAME SIZE as each of the first two.  THAT'S the one that
took me a week or two to wrap my head around.  :)


No, they're not the same size.  I'm sure of it.  I counted them.

Okay, I didn't count ALL of them.  But I counted enough to feel  
good about
my answer.  And feeling good about answers is what mathematics is  
all about,

isn't it?


Mathematical Truthiness.

Dave


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l