On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Ronn! Blankenship
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note how Thorax gets it exactly backwards (according to contemporary
evolutionary biologists) in the second panel
It's wrong from the basic premise, that Darwin either sought to or believed
that he had proved there is
From: Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure that all that many people have learned not to be greedy and
short-term focused.
No doubt. But some have learned that house prices don't always go up.
My posting was ironically predictive, as my job fell victim to the market's
obsession with
Ronn! Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You obviously have B.S. in statistics.
You obviously are overestimating me. Try a non-linear curve fit.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
i think it is already too late, considering
humanity's greed, and lack of foresight.
Could be. I had a heck of a time getting a statistically significant
r-squared with a 4th order curve fit to the modified Malthus
equation, particularly with the stiffness of the inverse-greed parameter.
So what if you don't believe in God and your neighbors
are alcholic assholes who keep the neighberhood up all night
and mistreat their dogs?
Olin
hopefully they will pass out and their dogs will attack them!~)
jon
___
The way I see it, a short-term focus on cash returns is a
good thing for all
but the most proven and talented forward thinkers. It keeps
the market
moving towards greater efficiency.
the way i see it is focusing on cash returns is a BAD thing no matter how
efficient it makes the market:
Jon Louis Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the way i see it is focusing on cash returns is a BAD thing no matter how
efficient it makes the market:
How would you allocate resources among all the people who say if I only had
this then I could accomplish ___?
hopefully they will pass out and their dogs will attack them!~)
jon
Now, that's something I can pray for.
Olin
- Original Message -
From: Jon Louis Mannmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussionmailto:brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Monday, September 08,
Jon Louis Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it's not just about population demographics; it is about large carbon
footprints
due to capitalism, greed, and materialism. western populations are probably
one
of the worse offenders, but the asian countries are rapidly catching up with
our
model.
September's issue of Scientific American is devoted to technology and
privacy.
Himself is cited in the Editor's note.
There is also an item that I found very interesting. It seems that in 2006
two
Swiss primate researchers attempted to renew their research licenses through
the local veterinary
the way i see it is focusing on cash returns is a BAD
thing no matter how efficient it makes the market:
How would you allocate resources among all the people who
say if I only had
this then I could accomplish ___?
by telling them if i had a laxative i could have a bowel
Jon Louis Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the way i see it is focusing on cash returns is a BAD thing no matter how
efficient it makes the market:
Good point. If the market were less efficient, almost no one would be able to
afford computers or Internet access. Then no one would need to listen
to
It started at the RNC convention, now Woodward has a new book out
talking about how incompetent Bush was handling the war. He is being
interviewed right now by Larry King. I am waiting to hear how McCain
was trying to get Bush to change things. So what is the point? Well,
of course, the
At 03:25 PM Monday 9/8/2008, John Williams wrote:
Jon Louis Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the way i see it is focusing on cash returns is a BAD thing no matter how
efficient it makes the market:
How would you allocate resources among all the people who say if I only had
this then I could
At 02:34 PM Monday 9/8/2008, John Williams wrote:
Ronn! Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You obviously have B.S. in statistics.
You obviously are overestimating me.
You're saying that what you wrote earlier doesn't come up to the level of B.S.?
. . . ronn! :)
the way i see it is focusing on cash returns is a BAD
thing no matter how
efficient it makes the market:
Good point. If the market were less efficient, almost no
one would be able to
afford computers or Internet access. Then no one would need
to listen
to crazies spouting nonsense
Jon Louis Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you don't get it john, the market is fixed; it is rigged by the plutocrats.
Thank you Jon! I've been so naive, but you have opened my eyes. Those
evil plutocrats have really kept me down, but I won't stand for it any more!
they don't care what all this
Ronn! Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're saying that what you wrote earlier doesn't come up to the level of
B.S.?
Now you're twisting my words. Straighten up and try a linear curve fit!
___
18 matches
Mail list logo
