Warren Ockrassa wrote:
I really enjoyed this, but can't share it with my colleagues, since
they wouldn't get either reference.
Sometimes it's really a pain in the ass to be a programmer and
English major working in a PR department as the graphics guy.
David Hobby wrote:
That is nice. I'm sure I can find some people
who'll appreciate both references, and not just
say that the followers of Cthuhlu should use
different variable names for clarity.
Maybe we should parody the wikibook on C programming
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Warren Ockrassa wrote:
I really enjoyed this, but can't share it with my colleagues, since
they wouldn't get either reference.
Sometimes it's really a pain in the ass to be a programmer and
English major working in a PR department as the graphics guy.
On Dec 17, 2009, at 5:36 AM, Max Battcher wrote:
Beyond that, it doesn't seem like proper Kernigan and Ritchie code because it
is not formatted properly in the KR style... It almost looks more like GNU
code.
Well, the sign did declare that the place was called GCC...
--
Warren Ockrassa |
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:32 AM, Alberto Monteiro
albm...@centroin.com.brwrote:
joke critic
The code is wrong:
void Cthulhu
(int Ia) {
if (Ia/10)
Cthulhu (IA/10);
putchar // ftagn!
(Ia % 10 + '0');
} // neblod zin!
// is a comment in C++ and, by
